Laserfiche WebLink
<br />MINUTES Page 5 <br />City of San Leandro City Council and San Leandro Redevelopment Agency Joint Meeting-June 6, 2005 <br /> <br />project's CC&Rs to include the future construction and use of this access and how the <br />cost of the improvements would be divided. <br /> <br />Councilmember Nardine commented that initially she was excited about this project <br />and its potential for improving the area. She stated that now she feels there are still <br />too many gray areas, and the project needs additional refinement before it is approved. <br /> <br />Councilmember Grant acknowledged that this project has undergone a long process. <br />She stated that she feels there is more to be done on the project before it can be <br />approved. Councilmember Grant pointed out a discrepancy in the noticing for the <br />project, and much of District 2 that is impacted by the project was left out. She <br />recalled that when the project was first introduced to the neighboring community, it <br />was the residents in the adjacent District 2 area who expressed concerns, and she felt <br />the noticing did not provide a fair distribution of information nor an opportunity for <br />participation. Community Development Director Hanson Hom stated that an <br />expanded notification beyond 300 feet was performed. He noted that, early in the <br />process, there was a lot of concern among the residents on Aloha Drive about the <br />proposal to open up Ian Street to through traffic and the possible impacts on homes <br />and traffic along Aloha Drive. As a result, the noticing was expanded to include all <br />the residents on both sides of Aloha Drive who had expressed interest in the project, <br />as well the homeowners associations in the area. Additionally, the applicant <br />performed mailings and went door-to-door to hand out flyers about the project. Mr. <br />Hom indicated that the community meetings held to discuss the project were well- <br />attended and included residents of the surrounding neighborhoods. <br /> <br />Councilmember Grant echoed Councilmember Nardine's concerns regarding the <br />location and design of the affordable units. She asked if some of the market rate units <br />could also have tandem driveways so that the affordable units did not stand out. Mr. <br />Hom stated that this is the first project under which the provisions of the Inclusionary <br />Zoning Ordinance apply. Mr. Hom noted that the affordable units in this project are <br />the best that have been proposed for development thus far in terms of their integration <br />with market rate units. He pointed to other projects which have been developed <br />recently and noted that the affordable units for those projects are very distinct, <br />separate and not as well-integrated with the rest of the development as are the <br />affordable units proposed for this project. <br /> <br />Mr. Hom recalled the Council's adoption of the Inclusionary Zoning Ordinance, <br />noting that the Council and staff had received input from developers, including Britt <br />Evans, in crafting the ordinance. The ordinance was designed to give flexibility in <br />determining how the units could be incorporated in the development. Due to <br />economic impacts, there were some concessions to allow the affordable units to be <br />smaller as long as they reflected the same quality as the market rate units. Mr. Hom <br />indicated that a great deal of effort has gone into integrating the affordable units into <br />this project, and this project represents the best example of integration of affordable <br />and market rate units thus far in the City. <br />