Laserfiche WebLink
<br />MINUTES Page 2 <br />City of San Leandro City Council and San Leandro Redevelopment Agency Joint Meeting-January 3, 2006 <br /> <br />Zoning Regulations for Conversion of Existing Rental Projects to For Sale Projects. <br />(proposes Zoning Amendments to expand the application of the Inclusionary Zoning <br />Ordinance to include condominium conversions to the definition of "For Sale Project" <br />and "Residential Development"). <br /> <br />This being the time and place for the Public Hearing on the above matter, City Manager <br />J ermanis gave overview of the matter and introduced Community Development <br />Director Hanson Hom. Mr. Hom gave additional background on the matter and <br />provided details on the proposed Zoning Code amendments. Mr. Hom pointed out a <br />minor correction to the wording of the ordinance. <br /> <br />The Hearing was then opened to the public. <br /> <br />Lou Filipovich, San Leandro resident, addressed the City Council, commenting on <br />the amount of information about agenda items which is provided to the public. Mr. <br />Filipovich commented that the cost of Inclusionary Zoning will be paid by unemployed <br />renters. <br /> <br />There being no further comments from the public, and without objection, the Public <br />Hearing was closed. <br /> <br />Councilmember Starosciak asked several questions relating to the effects of the <br />proposed amendments. She asked why the City would want these amendments, since <br />the inclusionary units would not count toward the City's housing goals, monitoring the <br />units would increase the amount of staff time needed, and inclusionary zoning could <br />provide additional flexibility to developers to meet a different standard for inclusionary <br />units than for market-rate units. Mr. Horn stated that the goals in the City's Housing <br />Element, and State Housing Element law, require that the City produce housing which <br />meets a full range of needs. He indicated that the amendments to the Inclusionary <br />Zoning Ordinance are one way of meeting these needs, since it would help to offset the <br />loss of affordable rental units. Mr. Horn noted that this is policy issue and should be <br />included in Council's discussion of its commitment to meeting the general affordable <br />housing needs in the community. <br /> <br />Councilmember Starosciak stated that she did not see an advantage to the City in <br />adopting the ordinance. She commented that the ordinance would impose a burden on <br />the City, her district, and the people who would be purchasing and living in the <br />inclusionary units. Councilmember Starosciak stated that she believed condominiums <br />are more affordable to moderate-income residents anyway. She noted that the only city <br />in Alameda County with a stricter requirement than San Leandro is proposing is the <br />City of Livermore, and she did not feel comfortable passing the ordinance. <br /> <br />Councilmember Grant recalled that the Council previously discussed the issue and <br />determined that Inclusionary Housing was the right thing to do for the community. She <br />commented that since the Inclusionary Zoning Ordinance applies to other types of <br />residential development within the City, it makes sense to extend its application to <br />condominium conversions. <br />