Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Excerpts/rom the Planning Commission Meeting Minutes <br />Agenda No. 06-11 <br /> <br />June 8, 2006 <br />Page 60/10 <br /> <br />proposed, it would cost the City money because the City would be liable for losses in the <br />value of Garden Terrace units. He said his unit would be the first test case since he is <br />currently in the process of buying a new house and would soon be attempting to sell his <br />Garden Terrace condominium. He asked that the Planning Commission require that the <br />developer redesign the property so everyone involved gets a fair deal. <br /> <br />Justin Taylor, 1599 Hays Street, said he and his neighbors would like to see 1537 Hays <br />developed, but would like to see a more livable solution for everyone concerned, with a <br />smaller number of units and a lower townhouse style, similar to the development at <br />Thornton and San Leandro Boulevard. He said the park idea is fantastic. He said that <br />Langon has brought forward nice designs in the past, but he characterized the proposed <br />design as a little too jammed in and a little bit too "McMansion." <br /> <br />Belinda Jackson, Unit 401, 1599 Hays, said she had lived in Garden Terrace for 14 <br />years, renting from 1992 and purchasing her south-facing unit in 1999. She said she was <br />present to speak on behalf of her neighbors whose north-facing views would be blocked. <br />She said she would be happy to see an alternative design. <br /> <br />Abdul Mahid Kabdo, Unit 401, 1599 Hays, suggested that the Plarming Commission <br />should carefully consider the issue before them because litigation might be initiated, <br />either by the Garden Terrace condominium owners or by the developer. He said he felt <br />the City's statements with regard to CEQA were conclusionary. He referred the Planning <br />Commission to a decision in a similar case, San Lorenzo Valley Community Advocates <br />for Responsible Change versus the San Lorenzo Unified School District out of the 6th <br />District Court of Appeal. <br /> <br />Jason Monroe, Unit 106, 1599 Hays Street, said he had purchased his unit at the <br />beginning of 2004. He said that a reduction in the setback of the proposed south-facing <br />dwellings from 15 to 10 feet would decrease the amount of daylight available to his unit. <br />He said that windows in his unit that face south look into the interior of the Garden <br />Terrace complex and do not add as much light to his unit. <br /> <br />Ken Papierniak said he was appearing at the request of Robert Jones, the owner of four <br />adjoining parcels, who is currently out of the country. He said Mr. Jones has the same <br />concerns as the other people that had spoken, although he has an opposite view. He said <br />that Mr. Jones and partners have bought up the single-family homes surrounding the <br />proposed project. He said Mr. Jones and his partners are concerned about property values <br />and he feels that, if 1587 Hays were to be developed as a massive apartment building as <br />shown, Mr. Jones' properties would experience a severe adverse impact. He said that Mr. <br />Jones had submitted a letter strongly endorsing the proposed project. He said that Mr. <br />Jones believes the project is needed in the area. He said that Mr. Jones, based on 25 <br />years' experience as a real estate broker in San Leandro, believes the proposed project <br />would actually enhance the value of Garden Terrace properties. <br /> <br />Commissioner Wohltmann asked the public speaker if Mr. Jones' opinion is that, if he <br />was the owner of one of the units facing the south wall of the project and he had a large <br />wall twenty feet away from his primary window space in his unit, the value of his unit <br />would be enhanced. <br />