My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
3B Public Hearing 2006 0905
CityHall
>
City Clerk
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2006
>
Packet 2006 0905
>
3B Public Hearing 2006 0905
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/10/2007 11:37:48 AM
Creation date
9/11/2006 12:34:49 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CM City Clerk-City Council
CM City Clerk-City Council - Document Type
Staff Report
Document Date (6)
9/5/2006
Retention
PERM
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
73
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />PLN2006-00074 (Appeal of the BZA Approval ofPLN2005-00063) <br />3 <br /> <br />September 5, 2006 <br /> <br />Permits and/or Variances Granted <br /> <br />Pursuant to Zoning Code Section 2-582, Major View Preservation and Site Plan Review is <br />required for two- and three-story development in the RS- VP Sub-District. In addition, a Height <br />Exception is required as the proposed average roof height of the main home and the in-law unit <br />exceed the 18- foot height limit for the RS- VP District. The revised plans now show an average <br />roof height of 28 feet for the main home; the original plans for the carriage house show an <br />average roof height of24 feet. <br /> <br />Environmental Review <br /> <br />This item is categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) per <br />CEQA Guidelines, Article 19, Section 15303. A Negative Declaration and Initial Study was <br />prepared and adopted by the City Council in approval of a Tentative Map for the 12-1ot subdivision <br />in December 1989. This property was designated as Lot 9 in this subdivision. <br /> <br />Staff has reviewed the original Negative Declaration and the Tentative Map that was approved by <br />City Council in 1989. The proposed new home and in-law unit are in general conformance with the <br />placement of the building pad approved for Lot 9. In addition, all conditions of approval for the <br />Tentative Map have been completed by the subdivision developer. The discussion of moving the <br />house toward the front of the property, mentioned in the appeal letter, was not supported by either <br />the Planning Commission or the City Council in their respective review of the proposed Tentative <br />Map and no conditions of approval on the Tentative Map directed the applicant to modify its <br />proposed lot configuration for Lot 9. The minutes from the 1989 Planning Commission and City <br />Council hearings on the subdivision Tentative Map are attached to this report. <br /> <br />Code Compliance Review <br /> <br />Not applicable <br /> <br />Board/Commission Findinl!s <br /> <br />The proposed dwelling and in-law unit would comply with the RS-VP District development <br />standards for lot coverage, building setbacks and parking requirements. The main dwelling roof <br />height of 28 feet and the in-law unit roof height of 24 feet both exceed the 18-foot height limit in <br />the RS- VP District and as such require the Height Exception. <br /> <br />On July 20, 2006, the Board of Zoning Adjustments conducted a pubic hearing on the Height <br />Exception and Major Site Plan ReviewNiew Preservation. Staff provided a presentation of the <br />project and recommended that the Board of Zoning Adjustments approve the project subject to <br />conditions. During the hearing, comments were made by members of the public, both in favor and <br />in opposition. The comments focused primarily on concerns about the size of the home, the <br />building height and its placement on the hillside and the number of persons to be living at the home <br />(minutes are in Attachment 6). <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.