Laserfiche WebLink
<br />CITY OF SAN LEANDRO <br /> <br />STAFF REPORT <br /> <br />DATE: <br /> <br />October 4, 2006 <br /> <br />TO: <br /> <br />Finance Committee <br /> <br />FROM: <br /> <br />Jesse Baloca, Finance Dire~ <br /> <br />Victor Chan, Budget and Compliance Manager ve.... <br /> <br />BY: <br /> <br />SUBJECT: <br /> <br />Update on Business License Tax Exemption for Related Party Residential <br />Property Rentals (RPRP's) <br /> <br />BACKGROUND AND DISCUSSION <br /> <br />As requested by the Finance Committee on September 6, 2006, staff has brought back <br />some business license tax (BL T) statistics on residential property rentals and revenues <br />collected. At the last meeting regarding a BLT exemption forRPRP's, the following two <br />alternatives were shared for discussion: <br /> <br />1. Creating a definition for family and extended family, and crafting an exemption for <br />rentals made to both relationship categories. The concern with this alternative is that <br />it could be considered discriminatory since the definition of family is legally broader. <br />A letter from the City Attorney is provided and explains the challenges with <br />implementing and enforcing an ordinance that creates an exemption to the BLT for <br />RPRP's. <br /> <br />2. Exempting all rental property owners that have only one residential rental unit. <br />However, the fiscal impact on exempting the estimated 567 current businesses of this <br />type could result in an approximately $62k loss (based on the new rates) to the City. <br /> <br />As a result, staff s recommendation is to continue with its current practice of reviewing <br />customer request letters for a tax and penalty waiver and make appropriate reductions <br />according to administrative criteria. <br /> <br />Residential Property Statistics and Revenues Collected <br /> <br />Business Licenses Issued and Revenue Collected <br />During the first eight months of 2006, the City has collected $256k in business license tax <br />revenue from residential property rentals. This represents a $138k increase from 2005 <br />over the same period. The increase in revenue primarily reflects the auditing efforts <br />provided by MBlA I. <br /> <br />1 Eight months of data were used in order to provide a comparable analysis. <br />