Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Jermanis also explained that if the City decided to pursue a living wage ordinance, Council <br />would also need to establish the level of compliance efforts required for monitoring that <br />ordinance. Jermanis also pointed other issues for consideration when evaluating the living wage <br />that include: <br /> <br />1. Benefits to the part-time employees, <br />2. Comparable pays in other jurisdictions, and <br />3. Reciprocal effect on all City positions. <br /> <br />Human Resources Director Caire reported that the City currently has 91 part-time seasonal <br />employees who are paid below the proposed $14/hr living wage rate. If current wages are raised <br />to the living wage level and the rate separations between all classifications are maintained, the <br />preliminary cost estimates are more than $500k ($300k initial impact and $200k-300k impact for <br />position rollups). Caire further explained that more time is required for developing a more <br />defined estimate and to conduct a comparison of part-time pay with other cities. <br /> <br />Mayor Young questioned which 20 Bay Area cities have a living wage ordinance as mentioned <br />in a previous Council meeting. Young requested a copy of the Hayward and Oakland's living <br />wage ordinance for Committee review. <br /> <br />Jermanis explained that the Purchasing Agent functions are currently performed by one full-time <br />and one part-time positions and that the Engineering section reviews a contractor's payroll for <br />compliance. The Finance Department does not have a compliance section to monitor living wage <br />now; therefore, the Finance Department might have to add staff to perform this function. <br /> <br />In response to the question on Crossing Guards expenditures raised by Young, Jermanis <br />explained that the School District is not willing to pay so the City funds the program. Some <br />Recreation Programs would not be sustainable if the City had to pay a living wage. If living <br />wage was implemented, certain Recreation programs could face cutbacks or the City would have <br />to provide additional subsidy. <br /> <br />Jermanis approximated that three more meetings would be needed to discuss all the issues before <br />forwarding to Council a Finance Committee recommendation for supporting or not supporting a <br />living wage ordinance. Staff will bring back more data, information on what other cities are <br />doing, and issues they are facing to the Committee. <br /> <br />2. Discussion Regarding First Quarter 2006-07 Investment Report <br /> <br />Baloca reported that the City's investment portfolio, as of September 30, 2006, had a market <br />value of $75.4m, reflecting a small increase of $2.26m from June 30, 2006. LAIF's investment <br />return of 4.93% continued to exceed Chandler's investment return of 3.9%. The City recently <br />purchased more corporate notes bringing the percentage held close to the policy threshold of <br />10%. The City's investment strategy remains the same as last quarter, in which the City <br />purchases short-term investments to gain liquidity and maintain a higher yield, while also <br />purchasing long-term investments to secure rates in the current environment. <br /> <br />Baloca reported that he and Budget and Compliance Manager Chan met with Morgan Stanley <br />representatives to learn about the brokerage services they can provide. Baloca explained that the <br />City's investment cost will be lowered by using brokerage service instead of portfolio investment <br />management since a broker only charges for trades purchased. Baloca estimated that the City <br />