My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
3A Public Hearing 2006 1204
CityHall
>
City Clerk
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2006
>
Packet 2006 1204
>
3A Public Hearing 2006 1204
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/10/2007 11:34:50 AM
Creation date
12/1/2006 10:50:58 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CM City Clerk-City Council
CM City Clerk-City Council - Document Type
Staff Report
Document Date (6)
12/4/2006
Retention
PERM
Document Relationships
_CC Agenda 2006 1204
(Reference)
Path:
\City Clerk\City Council\Agenda Packets\2006\Packet 2006 1204
MO 2006-044
(Reference)
Path:
\City Clerk\City Council\Minute Orders\2006
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
114
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />GEOTECNIA <br />Project Number: 060805 <br />2888 Darius Way, San Leandro <br />October 27, 2006 <br /> <br />Page 12 <br /> <br />Seismic Loads <br /> <br />Horizontal accelerations during seismic events will momentarily increase lateral earth pressures <br />against walls. We recommend using an equivalent seismically induced earth pressure with a <br />rectangular distribution equal to FH psf, where F. depends on the magnitude of the ground <br />acceleration and H is the unsupported wall height in feet. The resultant seismic force would act <br />at 0.5H above the base of the wall. The seismic earth pressures are in addition to the static earth <br />pressure and lateral surcharge pressures, and should be considered in the design of retaining <br />walls. <br /> <br />The anticipated peak ground acceleration (pga) at the site during the maximum credible <br />earthquake on the Hayward Fault is estimated to be about 0.65 g. Using an estimated pga of 0.5 <br />g at the site, the value ofF would be 23. For smaller seismic events, the value ofF would be <br />lower. For a typical design ground acceleration of 0.2 to 0.3 g for residential structures, the <br />value ofF would be between 7 and 10. The choice of the value ofF to be used for retaining wall <br />design depends on the level of risk accepted by the designer and owner. If the walls are not <br />designed for the appropriate seismically induced earth pressures, consequences during strong <br />earthquake loading might include lateral movement, distress, or failure of the walls. <br /> <br />The magnitudes of the seismically-induced earth pressures above were calculated based on the <br />simplified procedure developed by Seed and Whitman (1970) and incorporated a reduction factor <br />on the order of 20 percent to judgmentally account for possible effects of wave scattering or <br />passage, the transient nature of earthquake ground motions, and possible wall-soil interaction <br />effects. <br /> <br />Concrete Slabs on Grade <br /> <br />If typical 3- to 4-inch-thick concrete slabs with little to no reinforcement are used for new <br />exterior walkway slabs and patios, they should be underlain by at least 36 inches of compacted <br />baserock or gravel to reduce the potential for cracking. This assumes that the downslope sides of <br />the walkways/patios have been stabilized by retaining walls designed to resist the lateral creep <br />forces as discussed in a previous section of this report. Preferably, exterior slabs should be at <br />least 6 inches thick with one grid of#4 steel reinforcement spaced at 12 inches in both directions <br />(in the middle of the slab) to help reduce the potential for cracking. <br /> <br />Ifmoisture penetration through interior floor slabs (garages) would be objectionable, slabs <br />should be underlain by a capillary moisture break consisting of at least 4 inches of clean, free- <br />draining crushed rock or gravel graded such that 100 percent will pass the I-inch sieve and none <br />will pass the No.4 sieve. Further protection against slab moisture penetration can be provided <br />by means of a moisture vapor barrier membrane, placed between the drain rock and the slab. <br />The membrane should be covered with at least 2 inches of damp, clean sand to protect it during <br />construction. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.