My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
8A Consent 2006 1218
CityHall
>
City Clerk
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2006
>
Packet 2006 1218
>
8A Consent 2006 1218
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/10/2007 11:33:08 AM
Creation date
12/15/2006 4:47:30 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CM City Clerk-City Council
CM City Clerk-City Council - Document Type
Draft Minutes
Document Date (6)
12/4/2006
Retention
PERM
Document Relationships
_CC Agenda 2006 1218
(Reference)
Path:
\City Clerk\City Council\Agenda Packets\2006\Packet 2006 1218
Minutes 2006 1204
(Superseded by)
Path:
\City Clerk\City Council\Minutes\2006
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />DRAFT MINUTES Page 5 <br />City of San Leandro City Conncil and San Leandro Redevelopment Agency Joint Meeting-December 4, 2006 <br /> <br />Conullunity Development Director Hanson Hom indicated that all the required legal <br />advertising was performed for this project. Mr. Hom acknowledged that the posting of <br />project plans was delayed and the billboard was erected just prior to the BZA hearing. <br />However, since the BZA hearing, staff has made a concerted effort to hold several <br />meetings with the Applicant to discuss ways to mitigate the Appellant's concerns. Mr. <br />Horn stated that the BZA received all the information necessary for adequate <br />deliberation on the height exception and the size of the home; however, the BZA did not <br />receive the updated soils report. Mr. Horn noted that a soils study is not normally <br />performed until the building permit stage; however, due to the strong concerns <br />regarding slope stability, the Applicant chose to hire a soils engineer to perform the <br />extensive study. He indicated that there was considerable review of the 1989 soils <br />report by staff, and staff felt the study was sufficient for the purpose of evaluating the <br />project since the house was being proposed to be constructed on the existing pad. <br /> <br />Ms. Barros stated that, although not required, it was recommended that a billboard be <br />erected at the site and that the Applicant send out notification letters to the neighbors. <br />The billboard was not erected until just prior to the BZA hearing and the letters were <br />never sent. Ms. Barros noted that the legally-required notification-the publication of <br />the public hearing notice and the 500-ft radius mailed notifications and posted notices- <br />was performed. <br /> <br />Mr. Hom commented that after the BZA's approval of the project, staff reviewed the <br />Zoning Code regarding the administrative exception for accessory structures. Mr. Hom <br />noted that a Zoning Code amendment was adopted a few years ago for second family <br />units. The in-law unit proposed for this project would be considered a second fanlily <br />unit rather than an accessory structure, and the unit would only be required to comply <br />with front, rear and side setback requirements. <br /> <br />City Manager Jermanis addressed the City's liability with regard to hill slides and <br />pointed out that all of Bay-O-Vista is built on a hill. While there are no assurances that <br />slides will not occur, Mr. Jermanis noted that the City Council has an obligation to <br />exercise its best judgment based on the information provided. <br /> <br />City Attorney Jayne Williams commented that legislative action taken by the City <br />Council is based on the due diligence exercised by staff and the professionals that <br />provide them with information. Ms. Williams indicated that legislative immunities <br />exist to protect the City against potential litigation. Ms. Williams commented that, <br />although there is often risk in the activities in which the City engages, the City has <br />exercised considerable due diligence in this project. <br /> <br />There being no further comments from the public, and without objection, the Public <br />Hearing was closed. <br /> <br />Councilmember Santos asked whether the building could be constructed further <br />westward in order to reduce the view obstruction to the uphill neighbors. Mr. Hom <br />commented that this option was suggested at a meeting with the Applicant. He noted <br />that the house is currently proposed to be built on the existing pad, and moving the <br /> <br />5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.