Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Draft Minlltes Excerpt - Joint Buard/Plalllling Commission Work Sessiun <br />Octoher /9, 2006 <br /> <br />3 <br /> <br />Commissioner Kleebauer added that parking issues have been diseussed at several Planning <br />Comrnission meetings in the context of some of the denser single-family developments, <br />including row homes in the 3,OOO-square-foot neighborhood. <br /> <br />Boardmember Marr asked whether the discussion covers Mulford Gardens, because parking <br />issues also come up in regard to these properties, which have single-family homes with duplexes <br />in back that are heing converted into condominiums, <br /> <br />Planning Manager Pollart responded that the condominium conversion discussion, next on the <br />agenda, would address Commissioner Marr's question. <br /> <br />Boardmemher Peal-son said that he'd prefer to require additional off-street parking lor large <br />homes rather than hope that residents would opt for mass transit and not have additional cars. <br /> <br />Commissioner KJeebauer explained that her focus is on housing so convenient to mass transit <br />that the occupants would he less car-dependent, as in New York. ]n denser areas of the City, she <br />said, we should not necessarily always require two covered parking spaces since we are trying to <br />encourage use of public transit. <br /> <br />Planning Manager Pollart, in response, raised the issue of enforcement. Today's planned <br />developments proceed under condition that garages are used for cars, and the homeowners' <br />association (HOA) is responsible lor enforcement, but the City lacks a vehicle for enlorcing such <br />conditions with single-family homes that arc not part of a planned development. <br /> <br />Commissioner Perras pointed out that more and more, homeowners use garage space lor <br />storage rather than parking, and wondered if anything might be done to reverse that trend. <br /> <br />Community Development Director Horn eXplained the difficulty and impracticality in <br />enforcing because the compliance stalT is so small and has so many other priorities. <br /> <br />Commissioner Perras noted that where houses are close together, if someone parks a <br />recreational vchicle (RY) in the driveway, neighbors backing out cannot even see oncoming <br />traffic. He referenced regulations regarding fence height or three ICet, hut no governance of <br />vehicles six feet high. <br /> <br />Planning Manager ]>ollart replied that RY parking is on the department's "to clo" list. In the <br />meantime, some regulations do already govern RVs, to the extent that code compliance cloes not <br />issue citations on RVs that arc parked in a driveway deeper than the 20-foot front yard setback. <br />The understanding behincl the code is that RVs can park in side yards behind a fence. <br /> <br />Commissioner D1ugosh pointed out that if the City passcs ordinances in response to community <br />pushes for standards such as requirements to park in garages - that it is ineumhent on the <br />community to enforce those standards. <br /> <br />Community Development Director Horn agreed, but reiterated that CUlTcnt resources are <br />insufficient to handle the workload and the backlog ofitcms requiring enlorcement. <br /> <br />Commissioner Kleebauer requested a lega] opinion on constitutional property ownership rights, <br />wondering whether the City can tell citizens how to use their private property, <br /> <br />Assistant City Attorney Stuart said she would have to look at it, because the City does also <br />have some rights, particularly as regards issues of health and safety, for example. <br />