My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
3A Public Hearing 2007 0116
CityHall
>
City Clerk
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2007
>
Packet 2007 0116
>
3A Public Hearing 2007 0116
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/4/2007 12:46:30 PM
Creation date
1/18/2007 11:16:26 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CM City Clerk-City Council
CM City Clerk-City Council - Document Type
Staff Report
Document Date (6)
1/16/2007
Retention
PERM
Document Relationships
_CC Agenda 2007 0116
(Reference)
Path:
\City Clerk\City Council\Agenda Packets\2007\Packet 2007 0116
8C Consent 2007 0205
(Reference)
Path:
\City Clerk\City Council\Agenda Packets\2007\Packet 2007 0205
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
43
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />D/'i{ft Minlltes Excerpt - Joint Hoard/Planning COlI/lIlissiun Work Sessio/l <br />Oc(o!Jer 19, 2006 <br /> <br />6 <br /> <br />uncovered. She asked that if the City goes the route of requiring additional parking spaces for <br />large homes, that they not necessarily require them to be covered spaces. <br /> <br />Boardmemher Chin wondered, if a homeowner wanted to add four bedrooms to a three- <br />bedroom home, would additional ofT-street parking also be required? <br /> <br />Commissioner Dlugosh indicated that the application in this instance would be denied unless <br />the remodel included provision for more off-street parking. <br /> <br />Commissioner Collier expressed concem about the Building Department's use of the tenn <br />"bedroom" to spaces exceeding 90 square feet, and that it needs to be explained to applicants. <br /> <br />Planning Manager Pollart, noting that the Planning Department would make the detennination <br />of parking requirements, regardless of what the addition is called, and said that this situation <br />might be a reason to go in the direction of square footage rather than ten11inology. <br /> <br />Community Development Director Horn added that definitions would have to be clear to avoid <br />a proliferation of applications Cor approvals involving dens, home offices, recreation rooms and <br />so on to avoid the requirement for additional off-street parking. <br /> <br />Residential Condominium Conversions <br /> <br />Planning Manage.' Pollart tumed next to the residential condominium conversion process. She <br />noted that existing regulations arc that proposals involving up to laur units arc subject to <br />obtaining use pe1111its. The GZA has been seeing a lot of such applications in both RO and RD <br />Districts. New units, she explained, already trigger the Site Plan Review process, with the ZEO <br />doing the administrative approval. Currently, the Engineering and Transportation Department <br />examines Parcel Map applications. For this process, plans are forwarded to the Planning <br />Depal1ment for a so-called "Planner's Report" to indicate conCorrnance with the Subdivision <br />Map Act and the General Plan. The Engineering and Transportation Department takes the Parcel <br />Map application, along with the Planner's Report, to the City Council for approval, with neither <br />a Planning Commission nor Board of Zoning Adjustments recommendation required. With <br />applicants who split the process and apply far conversion to condominiums apart from building <br />construction, the BZA gets involved only from the LIse pe1111it standpoint. Accordingly, Planning <br />staff recommends deleting the Zoning Code section that requires the use pennit because it <br />involves only how the land is divided, not something over which the BZA nomlally has purview <br />today. Referencing the question that Boardmember Marr had raised earlier about Mulford <br />Gardens parking, Ms. Pollart said that staff is recommending that for the RO District, parking be <br />the same as for RS, RD and RS-40 Districts. Currently, she added, the code requires the RO <br />duplexes to have only three off-street parking spaces, whereas an RD District duplex requires <br />fOllr spaces. Depending on Commissioners' input, the Planning Department will next generate <br />specific amendment language to submit to the Planning Commission, the Board of Zoning <br />Adjustments and the City Council to approve the changes. <br /> <br />Boardmember Chin requested a clarification about the Parcel Map process, In response, Ms. <br />Pollart reiterated that the Parcel Map process, in and of itself, requires no recommendation from <br />either the Board of Zoning Adjustments or the Planning Commission before going to the City <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.