Laserfiche WebLink
<br />MINUTES Page 3 <br />City of SJn LCJndro City_ C<~l!!_cil amI San Leandro Redevel~~I?mcnt ^gcncy Joint Mectins;-.Julluary 16, 2007 <br /> <br />Vice Mayor Grant expressed concem regarding reducing the amount of public review lor <br />condominium conversions, noting that a large number of such conversions could <br />potentially change the character or a neighborhood and create impacts on inFrastructure <br />and services. She stated that she would not want to support the change. Vice Mayor <br />Grant asked if the proposed arnendment regarding the FAR would apply to all zoning <br />districts. Ms. Pollart con1inned that it would apply citywide. <br /> <br />Mayor Santos commented that the Zoning Code amendment was requested by the BZA <br />due to the inundation of applications for condo conversions. He noted that he has been <br />contacted by a nurnber of individuals in the Mulford Gardens area that are interested in <br />building condominiums on their properties. Mayor Santos commented that he believed <br />the amendment would result in greater oversight due to changes to the process. <br /> <br />Councilmember Starosciak conclllTed with Vice Mayor Grant regarding the issue of <br />community input on condo conversions. She pointed out that the General Plan focuses <br />on neighborhood character, and she expressed concern that the ease of condominium <br />conversions is drastically changing the character of MuI10rd Gardens. Councilmember <br />Starosciak commented that she feels this trend conflicts with the General Plan and that <br />the increased density would strain the city's infrastructure. She asked that the Council <br />remove Section 5-2424 for further consideration. Councilmemher Starosciak <br />commented that she feels there is a windlall of applications because they are lucrative, <br />and the easier the process is the more applications the City will receive. She suggested <br />looking into increasing developer fees and impact fees in order to recoup the costs ofthc <br />increased density resulting from these conversions. <br /> <br />Councilmember Stephens asked i r the conversion from rental units to condominiums <br />would actually result in greater density. Community Development Director Tlanson <br />Hom indicated that a condo conversion does not grant any greater density than the <br />current zoning allows; however, it could he an inccntive for a person to undertake a <br />project. <br /> <br />Mr. Hom noted that all projects go through site plan review, and it is during this review <br />that the change in the character or the neighborhood would he addressed. I Ie indicated <br />that administrative review does not eliminate public input, and there are noticing <br />requirements and a healing process. Mr. Horn noted that if a project is deemed to be <br />controversial, it would be referred to the BZA. The BZA recognized that condo <br />conversions for four or fewer units everywhere in the City except thc RO District are <br />already handled administratively, and the amcndment would allow condo convcrsions in <br />the RO to be handled in a manner consistent with the rest of the city. Mr. Hom <br />indicated that condo conversions are like any other residential project and are subject to <br />development fees and other requirements. He pointed out that while the General Plan <br />supports rnaintaining the eXlstrng zoning and character or the area, many parcels in the <br />RO District arc allowed to have up to three dwelling units. Mr. Hom suggested that the <br />Council may want to consider down-zoning in order to preserve the current character of <br />the area. <br />