My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Finance Highlights 2007 0207
CityHall
>
City Clerk
>
City Council
>
Committees
>
Finance Committee
>
Finance Highlights 2007 0207
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/6/2007 4:02:35 PM
Creation date
3/1/2007 9:35:11 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CM City Clerk-City Council
CM City Clerk-City Council - Document Type
Committee Highlights
Document Date (6)
2/7/2007
Retention
PERM
Document Relationships
_CC Agenda 2007 0305
(Reference)
Path:
\City Clerk\City Council\Agenda Packets\2007\Packet 2007 0305
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
24
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />d. Is a civil penalty sought to be imposed on the contractor by the state invalid?" 4 <br />Cal.Rptr.2d 837. <br /> <br />In light of this test, ANY PUBLIC AGENCY must require from bidders: <br /> <br />"We hold that the statutory obligation to pay the prevailing wage does not depend on the <br />contractor's assent, that the Director may validly and constitutionally determine that a <br />given project is for a public work, and that the doctrine of equitable estoppel does not <br />prevent the Director from proceeding against the contractor." 4 Cal.Rptr.2d 837 <br /> <br />"Public works contracts awarded to private contractors must include stipulations <br />requiring the contractors and subcontractors to pay their employees no less than the <br />applicable prevailing wage rates, as determined by the Director of the Department of <br />Industrial Relations. (SS 1773.2, 1775.) 4 Cal.Rptr.2d 837). <br /> <br />VIII. What are risks ANY PUBLIC AGENCY is exposed to: <br /> <br />"Lusardi argues that the actions of the District led to Lusardi's reliance, and that the <br />acts of the District should be attributed to the Director (of Industrial Relations)." <br /> <br />"The acts of one public agency will bind another public agency only when there is <br />privity, or an identity of interests between the agencies" (City and County of San <br />Francisco v. Grant Co. (1986) 181 Cal.App.3d 1085, <br /> <br />"In this case, there is no privity or identity of interest between the District and the <br />Director. Instead, there is a direct and palpable conflict. As its actions clearly evidence, <br />the District had an interest in obtaining the lowest possible cost for construction of the <br />hospital expansion project. The interest of the Director is in enforcing the prevailing <br />wage laws. Contractors that do not pay the prevailing wage to their workers enjoy a <br />competitive advantage over contractors that do, and may be preferred by local <br />government agencies for public works projects, because the construction dollar will <br />purchase more when a contractor paying less than the prevailing wage is selected. The <br />facts of this case illustrate this conflict of interest: the District seeks to avoid the <br />prevailing wage law, while the Director seeks to enforce it. 4 Cal.Rptr.2d 837). <br /> <br />If ANY PUBLIC AGENCY classifies a Public Works project as a maintenance project <br />and does not impose PREVAILING WAGE REQUIREMENTS in the contract, ANY <br />PUBLIC AGENCY will be subject to "We emphasize, however, that the contractor may <br />be entitled to indemnity from the public entity if it reasonably relied on the public entity's <br />representations that the project was not subject to the prevailing wage law, and that <br />when, as here, a contractor does rely in good faith on such representations, equity <br />prohibits the imposition of statutory penalties against the contractor for failing to pay the <br />prevailing wage." 4 Cal. Rptr.2d 837). <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.