Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. Organizational strength (e.g., record-keeping methods, financial systems, data collection). <br /> <br />The City Council then considers and approves the final funding recommendations. Once approval <br />is given, the City enters into contracts with each subrecipient, detailing the Scope of Work and <br />Budget for use of CDBG funds. CAP grants for public services have a two-year funding cycle, <br />while CDBG subrecipients are required to enter into an annual grant for the two-year period. <br /> <br />HOMELESS AND OTHER SPECIAL NEEDS ACTIVITIES <br /> <br />See "Table 1 - FY 2007-08 HUD Annual Action Plan: CDBG and HOME Funds" on Page 8 for <br />this year's activities. <br /> <br />Implementation of the County-wide Homeless Continuum of Care Plan and the Homeless and <br />Special Needs Housing Plan (EveryOne Home Plan) <br /> <br />Alameda County, the City of Berkeley and the City of Oakland and others have completed a long- <br />term special needs housing process resulting in the EveryOne Home Plan which seeks to address <br />the housing-related needs of persons with serious mental illness, those living with HIV I AIDS, and <br />those who are homeless. The EveryOne Home Plan reflects an increased recognition among health <br />care and services agencies throughout Alameda County that affordable housing is crucial to the <br />achievement of public and mental health program outcomes. Without stable, decent, and <br />aflordable housing, efforts to promote public and mental health among low-income populations in <br />the County are compromised. Public and mental health funding investments may be wasted when <br />their clients lose their housing. <br /> <br />The creation of an integrated, regional response offers a number of measurable, outcome-oriented <br />alternatives to the current model. Alameda County has a history of collaborative efforts, but until <br />now they have been focused primarily at the consumer or provider level - not at the systems level. <br />Making adjustments and changes at the systems level requires active participation by top <br />community leaders and government representatives. Moving towards this preferred future requires <br />that elected officials, as well as civic, business, and faith leaders recognize and commit to a <br />regional approach that will include such outcomes as: <br /> <br />1. Increased efficiency and effectiveness of local and regional housing and supportive service <br />programs through sharing of information, planning, clients, resources, and responsibility <br />across the multiple systems that must work together to address common issues. <br /> <br />2. More coordination of government and philanthropic funding. National research has <br />demonstrated that an integrated approach to long-term homelessness can significantly <br />reduce overall expenditures. <br /> <br />3. Increased local capacity to attract competitive grants from federal, state, and philanthropic <br />sources that can augment existing housing and service systems and support the replication <br />of emerging promising practice models. <br /> <br />Draft Action Plan - FY2007-08 <br />City of San Leandro <br />Page ]0 <br />