My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
3A Public Hearing 2007 0507
CityHall
>
City Clerk
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2007
>
Packet 2007 0507
>
3A Public Hearing 2007 0507
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/16/2007 10:49:00 AM
Creation date
5/4/2007 9:21:17 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CM City Clerk-City Council
CM City Clerk-City Council - Document Type
Staff Report
Document Date (6)
5/7/2007
Retention
PERM
Document Relationships
_CC Agenda 2007 0507
(Reference)
Path:
\City Clerk\City Council\Agenda Packets\2007\Packet 2007 0507
MO 2007-058
(Reference)
Path:
\City Clerk\City Council\Minute Orders\2007
Reso 2007-060
(Reference)
Path:
\City Clerk\City Council\Resolutions\2007
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
105
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Planning Commission Meeting Draft Minutes Excerpt for meeting of April 12, 2007 <br /> <br />Page 7 of 10 <br /> <br />Acting Chair/Commissioner Dlugosh asked Mr. Gregg to wrap up his comments <br />because his five minutes were up. <br /> <br />Mr. Gregg indicated that there is apparently no basis for comparing parking needs and <br />traffic generated by Stepping Stones. The current tenant approximately 20 employees and <br />perhaps 50 people using their services daily. Off-street Herma Court parking has always <br />been a big issue, he added, and families with children live right across the street from <br />where a lot of the traffic from the development would exit. <br /> <br />Acting Chair/Commissioner Dlugosh asked whether any Commissioners had any <br />questions of Mr. Gregg. <br /> <br />Mr. Gregg asked ifthere's somewhere he might send the rest of the concerns that he did <br />not have time to address. <br /> <br />Acting Chair/Commissioner Dlugosh replied yes, to the Planning Department, for <br />consideration when the City Council meets. <br /> <br />Sue Chen, 980 Victoria Avenue. She urged Commissioners not to approve mitigation on <br />the parking. Just because the architect or builder hopes buyers will do so, she said, does <br />not mean they will park tandem. She also noted that there is barely any parking on Herma <br />Court now. Ten spaces for 23 units on an acre is not realistic. She also noted that she has <br />heard nothing about contributions to the San Leandro tax base. With no retail space, she <br />asked, is the increased cost of providing school, police, traffic and other services going to <br />offset the tax loss? She understands that high-density is needed, and she has no problem <br />with that, but this is too much density. She objects to an exception on the FAR, observing <br />that fewer units would be much more acceptable. She also agrees (with Mr. Gregg) that <br />there will be no privacy in any of the adjacent back yards. She indicated that "tremendous <br />cooperation" would be needed for peuple to get in and out of their garages. She even <br />questions whether there is enough space for neighbors to get around someone washing <br />their car. <br /> <br />William Artz, 1044 Broadmoor Boulevard, said that he is quite concerned about the <br />number of parking spaces planned to go on MacArthur - 16 in front and an undetermined <br />number across the street by the Imperial Garden. He says that 50% to 60% of the vehicles <br />on MacArthur travel well over the posted speed limit, with enforcement officers seldom <br />in the area to slow them down. It's a concern with family units going in. There are a lot <br />of children with very little play space, which poses another density problem and possibly <br />another reason to reduce the unit count from 23 to. 22, and use the additional space for <br />more play areas or more parking within the complex rather than on the street. He <br />considers erosion control and utility upgrades in lieu of taxes "ludicrous." Such things are <br />standard for any type of new construction and should be a standard cost for the builder. It <br />should not allow the developer to get out of paying taxes for schools, parks and streets. <br />He also noted that although he lives within the 300-foot radius of the site, he recalls <br />seeing only the notice for the March 29 meeting. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.