My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
RDA Reso 2005-013
CityHall
>
City Clerk
>
City Council
>
Resolutions
>
2005
>
RDA Reso 2005-013
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/10/2007 12:21:11 PM
Creation date
5/10/2007 12:18:49 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CM City Clerk-City Council
CM City Clerk-City Council - Document Type
Resolution
Document Date (6)
7/18/2005
Retention
PERM
Document Relationships
Agmt 2005 1103 Davis Street LLC
(Approved)
Path:
\City Clerk\City Council\Agreements\2005
Inst 2005388458
(Approved)
Path:
\City Clerk\City Council\Recorded Documents\2005
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />33433 Report-/ /03 Davis Street <br /> <br />July 2005 <br /> <br />The City of San Leandro has already been repaid for its interest in 1103 Davis, which was a <br />Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) award to a non-profit buyer who had previously <br />purchased the site from the Agency. The non-profit buyer was unable to fulfill the terms of its <br />DDA. As a result, it reconveyed the property to the Agency in 2003, which advanced repayment <br />to the City of the CDBG obligation, which under HUD regulations was considered to be the <br />appraised value (see below). While this transaction was entirely separate from the currently <br />contemplated agreement, it is described in order to explain the previously-expended acquisition <br />cost to the Agency. <br /> <br />ESTIMA TED VALUE OF THE INTEREST DETERMINED AT HIGHEST AND BEST <br />USE <br /> <br />The Property was appraised in February 2003 at a value of $520,000 for multifamily housing as <br />the highest and best use for development permitted by the Zoning Code, in the opinion of the <br />appraiser. The property was marketed since 2003 at this price without any success, until a <br />developer of small infill attached residential projects approached the Agency with an offer to buy <br />the Property in mid-2004. <br /> <br />The Property is zoned P (professional), and the General Plan land use designation is Office. <br />Multifamily residential development is not allowed in the P district, so the property would have <br />to be rezoned simultaneously with the processing of an amendment to the General Plan (both are <br />discretionary approval processes of the City), the cost of which was not considered in the <br />appraised value. Multifamily is allowed in ROR (Residential-Office-Retail), the Plaza <br />Redevelopment Plan's land use designation for the site. In many parts of Davis Street, including <br />this Property, the Zoning Code, General Plan, and Redevelopment Plan land use designations are <br />not in alignment, affecting the development potential of many properties by increasing the cost <br />of development. The Community Development Department's policy is to handle each of the <br />properties with misaligned land use designations on a case by case basis as part of project <br />approvals, funded by the developer and/or property owner. <br /> <br />ESTIMATED VALUE OF THE INTEREST DETERMINED BY USE REQUIRED BY <br />SALE <br /> <br />Because of the awkward configuration of the Property, its small size, and its adjacency to a small <br />residential street with one to two story single-family homes, residential development is the most <br />feasible development option. This was the interdepartmental staff consensus and was verified by <br />the market - no office developments were proposed as a result of the RFP conducted for the <br />property in 2003. The office development market remains in a slump for existing inventory; a <br />nearby office construction project at 1040 Davis Street will bring approximately 11,000 square <br />feet of new inventory to market in 2006. Therefore, additional new office development in this <br />area is both unlikely and relatively risky. The small retail strip center near the site on Davis <br />Street adequately serves the immediate neighborhood; providing a retail opportunity not already <br />existing, for example a full-service grocery store, would require a larger site than 1103 Davis. <br /> <br />Page 3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.