Laserfiche WebLink
<br />33433 Report-/ /03 Davis Street <br /> <br />July 2005 <br /> <br />The City of San Leandro has already been repaid for its interest in 1103 Davis, which was a <br />Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) award to a non-profit buyer who had previously <br />purchased the site from the Agency. The non-profit buyer was unable to fulfill the terms of its <br />DDA. As a result, it reconveyed the property to the Agency in 2003, which advanced repayment <br />to the City of the CDBG obligation, which under HUD regulations was considered to be the <br />appraised value (see below). While this transaction was entirely separate from the currently <br />contemplated agreement, it is described in order to explain the previously-expended acquisition <br />cost to the Agency. <br /> <br />ESTIMA TED VALUE OF THE INTEREST DETERMINED AT HIGHEST AND BEST <br />USE <br /> <br />The Property was appraised in February 2003 at a value of $520,000 for multifamily housing as <br />the highest and best use for development permitted by the Zoning Code, in the opinion of the <br />appraiser. The property was marketed since 2003 at this price without any success, until a <br />developer of small infill attached residential projects approached the Agency with an offer to buy <br />the Property in mid-2004. <br /> <br />The Property is zoned P (professional), and the General Plan land use designation is Office. <br />Multifamily residential development is not allowed in the P district, so the property would have <br />to be rezoned simultaneously with the processing of an amendment to the General Plan (both are <br />discretionary approval processes of the City), the cost of which was not considered in the <br />appraised value. Multifamily is allowed in ROR (Residential-Office-Retail), the Plaza <br />Redevelopment Plan's land use designation for the site. In many parts of Davis Street, including <br />this Property, the Zoning Code, General Plan, and Redevelopment Plan land use designations are <br />not in alignment, affecting the development potential of many properties by increasing the cost <br />of development. The Community Development Department's policy is to handle each of the <br />properties with misaligned land use designations on a case by case basis as part of project <br />approvals, funded by the developer and/or property owner. <br /> <br />ESTIMATED VALUE OF THE INTEREST DETERMINED BY USE REQUIRED BY <br />SALE <br /> <br />Because of the awkward configuration of the Property, its small size, and its adjacency to a small <br />residential street with one to two story single-family homes, residential development is the most <br />feasible development option. This was the interdepartmental staff consensus and was verified by <br />the market - no office developments were proposed as a result of the RFP conducted for the <br />property in 2003. The office development market remains in a slump for existing inventory; a <br />nearby office construction project at 1040 Davis Street will bring approximately 11,000 square <br />feet of new inventory to market in 2006. Therefore, additional new office development in this <br />area is both unlikely and relatively risky. The small retail strip center near the site on Davis <br />Street adequately serves the immediate neighborhood; providing a retail opportunity not already <br />existing, for example a full-service grocery store, would require a larger site than 1103 Davis. <br /> <br />Page 3 <br />