Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. . <br />, <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />.' .~. <br /> <br />be known presently because all plants, while they appear dead, are senescing (sleeping) <br />as they do during the winter and spring. ISP and partners are cautiously optimistic that <br />results will prove successful because of the use of imazapyr: Imazapyr is known to have <br />up to 90% efficacy in the State of Washington where managers have been fighting a <br />much larger infestation of invasive Spartina in WalIapa Bay. <br /> <br />Proiect Description for Requested Authorization <br />1. 2006 Control Proeram <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />The Conservancy.authorized disbursement of funds for treatment through 2006 in its June <br />2005 authorization. The proposed authorization would allow an expenditure of an <br />additional $715,299 of the WCB Proposition 50 funding already reserved for the ISP (S.ee <br />"Project Financing") to supplement existing treatment grants. While the nature, extent <br />. and scope of the proposed treatment and eradication projects have not changed from what <br />was described in connection with the 2005 authorizations, additional funding is needed to <br />cover unanticipated costs of operations through 2006. These unexpected increases <br />include 1) a significantly higher cost of the herbicide imazapyr, and 2) greater than <br />expected costs for subcontracts to specialized applicator companies that conduct <br />treatment operations. <br /> <br />Building upon partnerships and the successful regional coordination in 2005, ISP will <br />continue the same aggressive strategy for 2006. This will involve re-treating the' same <br />sites where partial infestation may have returned, and adding a majority of the remaining <br />phased sites' for initial" treatinent. These activities are already incorporated into the <br />existing Site-Specific Plans, covering 2005 and 2006, but work' for 2006 will include <br />some treatment work that was originally planned to take place in 2005. ISP consultants <br />are working with all grantees to update the Site-Specific Plans for the 2006 treatment <br />season, evaluating experiences from 2005 in order to improve what is planned for 2006, <br />making present~tions to regional stakeholders, obtaining necessary permits, and seeking <br />landowner permission to work on sites where work has not previously been done. <br /> <br />2. Monitorine Proi!ram <br /> <br />The Conservancy was awarded a grant .from the California Bay-Delta Authority <br />Ecosystem Restoration Program (ERP) to continue and. expand monitoring associated <br />with the ISP Control Program through 2009. This includes 1) annual surveys for non- <br />native Spartina in the San Francisco Estuary and the outer coast marshes lying in <br />proximity to the mouth of the Estuary; 2) monitoring marsh areas treated to control <br />invasive Spartina to determine if treatment was effective, including genetic analysis of . <br />Spartina samples, and' 3) surveys of endangered species, with special emphasis on .the <br />California clapper rail (collectively, the "Monitoring Program"). The Conservancy will <br />disburse ERP funds as an augmentation to existing ISP management contract(s) for <br />monitoring and mapping. The Monitoring Program will also involve a new interagency <br />agreement to the University of California at Davis or to an environmental services <br />contractor, for the genetic analysis of Spartina samples. <br /> <br />0-5 <br /> <br />EXHiBtT <br /> <br />.~ <br />) <br />