Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />City of San Leandro <br />Mid-Year Performance Report <br /> <br />Ending December 31, 2006 <br /> <br />Revenue Cash Flow Analvsis: <br />(Note: The City reports its revenues in the period earned. As a result, the timing of when cash is received may be slightly <br />different from that currently reported. For example, June 2006 sales tax was not remitted to the City until August 2006.) <br /> <br />· Major revenues include sales taxes, property taxes, vehicle license fees (VLF), utility user taxes <br />(UUT), and real property transfer taxes, which comprise 72% of the projected General Fund revenues. <br />The spikes in December primarily reflect the Governor's reduction of the VLF backfill revenue in <br />2004, and its replacement with a like amount of property tax. December also reflects the States 2004 <br />change to the V4% monthly sales tax with a semi-annual distribution of property tax. (See sales tax <br />below). . <br /> <br /> MAJOR REVENUES <br />Month I 2004-05 I 2005-06 I 2006-07 <br />Jul $ 3,276,339 $ 4,644,373 $ 2,688,588 <br />Aug 3,046,375 2,769,758 3,030,292 <br />Sep 3,710,178 3,132,718 3,175,250 <br />Oct 2,318,057 3,223,790 2,553,377 <br />Nov 2,900,546 2,616,068 2,992,486 <br />Dec 10,477,466 12,545,673 \2,845,911 <br />6 mo. YTn $ 25,728,961 $ 28,932,380 $ 27,285,904 <br />Jan 2,781,010 2,714,187 <br />Feb 3,037,281 2,947,920 <br />Mar 4,159,535 3,425,390 <br />Apr 8,614,571 6,036,505 <br />May 2,619,713 2,868,253 <br />Jun 3,260,615 7,818,310 <br />Total $ 50.2 01,686 $ 54,742945 $ 27,285904 <br /> <br />Major Revenues <br />(Property Tax, Sales Tax, Transfer Tax. wr, VLF) <br /> <br />II) $14,000 <br />" <br />ffi $12,000 <br />II) <br />~ $10,000 <br />f- <br />$8,000 <br /> <br />$6,000 <br /> <br />$4,000 <br />$2,000 <br /> <br />$0 <br /> <br /> <br />Jut Aug Sep 0:\ Nov cec Jan Feb Mar Apr Mcly Jun <br /> <br />- . . . - 2004-05 <br /> <br />-- 2005-06 <br /> <br />--2006-07 <br /> <br />· Current year sales tax projections reflect the 2004 passing of Proposition 57, the Triple-Flip. As a <br />result, ]/4 percent of the City's monthly sales tax revenues are back-filled semi-annually by an <br />estimated equivalent amount of property tax. Approximately one~half of the fiscal year 2006-07 <br />backfill was received in December 2006. <br /> <br /> SALES TAX <br />Month I 2004-05 I 2005-06 I 2006-07 <br />Jul $ 1,471,533 $ 1,140,632 $ 1,244,037 <br />Aug 1,854,063 1,516,812 1,643,485 <br />Sep 1,713,834 1,652,573 1,642,261 <br />Oct 1,125,681 1,085,610 1,274,947 <br />Nav 1,492,902 1,436,323 1,696,915 <br />Dec 3,717,606 4,549,415 4,697,821 <br />6 mo. YTn $ 11,375,619 $ 11,381,365 $ 12,199,466 <br />Jan 1,218,719 1,213,247 <br />Feb 1,614,264 1,621,075 <br />Mar 1,383,198 1,547,709 <br />Apr 3,454,839 1,150,023 <br />May 1,419,383 1,533,849 <br />Jun 1,572,010 3,777,487 <br />Total S 22,038,032 S 22,224,755 $ 12,199,466 <br /> <br />Sales Tax Revenue <br /> <br />i $5,000 <br />J S4,6OJ <br /> f.,f.(QI <br /> f:l,sm <br /> p,CIll <br /> 02500 <br /> $l,om <br /> $1,500 <br /> $t.OOO <br /> ... <br /> .. <br /> .... ""' "" <br /> <br /> <br />'" "'" Do< <br /> <br />Ftb MfIr ApI- "'''f -U1 <br /> <br />- . .. - - 2004-05 <br /> <br />__ 2005-06 <br /> <br />__2006-07 <br /> <br />· Beginning in fiscal year 2004-05, property tax reflects the permanent reduction of the VLF fee from <br />2% to 0.65% by the State, and the replacement of lost VLF backfill revenues to the City. As a result, <br />the VLF backfill now increases at the same rate as property assessed valuations In addition to <br />assessed valuation growth, 2006-07 property tax revenues will increase by $1.2 since the City's two <br />year obligated contribution to the State has ended as a result of Proposition lA. <br /> <br />6 <br />