8A Consent 2007 0604 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

DRAFT MINUTES Page 8 City of San Leandro City Council and San Leandro Redevelopment Agency Joint Meeting-May 7, 2007 commented that he feels this project is a good one and would improve the neighborhood, make it safer, attract new business, and improve the vitality ofthe area. Councilmember Gregory commented that he favors the project as it brings more housing into the City and supports the principles of transit-oriented development. He commented that he feels the parking issues could be mitigated. Councilmember Gregory stated that, if it is true that the changes to the project were not communicated to the neighborhood associations, he would favor delaying the decision. Councilmember Gregory left the meeting at 9: 10 p.m. Applicant Settlemeir responded to the public comments, indicating that there would be a decrease in the number of vehicle trips generated by the project due to the elimination of the commercial aspect. Mr. Settlemeir noted that the project is the same size as what was previously approved, but there are more and smaller units. Mr. Settlemeir disputed the notion that the project would be "big grey boxes," and he pointed out the architectural features of the proposed project. He acknowledged that he did not do an adequate job of gaining community support for the project; however, he stated that the local businesses and many local residents do support it. Mr. Settlemeir commented that over the past week, a negative email campaign was waged against the project. He remarked that the opposition by the neighbors is purely a NIMBY reaction. Architect Ruffin addressed the concerns about the fences near the property line, the setback on MacArthur and the "looming" of the buildings over neighboring residences. He noted that, while the buildings will be taller than what is currently there, they will be primarily on the MacArthur side. Mr. Ruffin stated willingness to consider reducing the Henna Court duplexes from three stories to two. The applicant and architect responded to questions from the Council regarding tne front walls; the orientation, setbacks and driveways of the homes on Henna Court; meetings the applicant held with the BNA and whether they have seen the new project configuration; the project footprint; the owner of the narrow lot and the possible land swap; neighborhood meetings held at Stepping Stones; and the number of inclusionary housing units required for this project. There being no further comments from the public, and without objection, the Public Hearing was closed. Vice Mayor Grant acknowledged staffs good work on the project. She stated that she supports additional housing in the area and complimented the architecture of the project. Vice Mayor Grant commented that she feels the project is too dense for the community and the parking ratio is insufficient. She indicated that she was neither in favor of the increased floor area ratio, nor of the setback variances. Mayor Santos pointed out that this project is supposed to generate fewer vehicle trips and require less parking than if it had a commercial component. He commented on the changing times and the need for higher density projects to meet the demand for housing.