My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
FacilitiesTransportation Highlights 2007 0523
CityHall
>
City Clerk
>
City Council
>
Committees
>
Facilities & Transportation Committee
>
FacilitiesTransportation Highlights 2007 0523
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/6/2007 4:00:53 PM
Creation date
6/1/2007 12:22:20 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CM City Clerk-City Council
CM City Clerk-City Council - Document Type
Committee Highlights
Document Date (6)
5/23/2007
Retention
PERM
Document Relationships
_CC Agenda 2007 0604
(Reference)
Path:
\City Clerk\City Council\Agenda Packets\2007\Packet 2007 0604
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
41
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Development of Alternative Plans: Based on the outcome of the first neighborhood meeting, staff <br />will develop alternative traffic calming plans to address the problems within the design and <br />operational guidelines of the Transportation Element. The alternative plans will conform to the <br />design standards of the Engineering and Transportation Department, and will be reviewed by the <br />Police Department, the Fire Department and the Public Works Department prior to distribution to <br />the public. The Fire Department must approve the location and design of all traffic calming <br />devices. The alternative plans will also be limited based on available funding. <br /> <br />These alternative plans will be presented to the neighborhood residents in a second meeting for <br />public review and comment. <br /> <br />Second Neighborhood Meeting: The purpose of the second neighborhood meeting is to determine <br />the neighborhood's preferred alternative. This will include a review of the alternatives, <br />discussion of the advantages and disadvantages of each alternative and selection of the preferred <br />alternative. It may be necessary to have more than one meeting on this topic in order to develop <br />consensus for a preferred alternative. <br /> <br />Trial Project: Staff may recommend a trial project phase for extremely extensive traffic calming <br />projects to study the effects of diverted traffic and to determine the effectiveness of the traffic <br />calming measures. The trial project period may last from six to nine months. <br /> <br />Diverted traffic is traffic that is diverted off of the roadway treated with traffic calming measures <br />and is placed on a different travel path. The goal is to encourage this diverted traffic onto <br />appropriate roadways, such as collectors and arterials, rather than onto other local residential <br />roadways. However, it is acceptable to see a small increase in traffic (approximately 10% <br />increase of the existing roadway volumes) on other parallel residential roadways. <br /> <br />It is important to note that trial projects tend to not be as effective as permanent installations. <br />Trial projects are much less attractive because they usually consist of pavement markings, cones <br />or rubber in the roadway to mimic the shape of the traffic calming device. There is no new <br />landscaping associated with trial projects. It is important to communicate this to the <br />neighborhood if staff recommends a trial project. <br /> <br />After the trial period, another neighborhood meeting will be held to discuss the effects ofthe trial <br />project and implementation of permanent measures. <br /> <br />Final Approval Ballot Requirement: Once the permanent project is finalized, another <br />neighborhood ballot measure is required to approve the [mal plan. A ballot will be mailed to each <br />resident. If the resident is not the property owner, a ballot will be mailed to both the property <br />owner and the resident with each receiving an equal vote. The ballot form will include the <br />locations of the measures, advantages and disadvantages of the Traffic Calming Plan. A positive <br />response from 67% of the returned ballots from the property owners and residents within the <br />neighborhood boundary is required. A minimum of 50% of the mailed out ballots must be <br />returned. 100% of the property owners that are directly impacted by the traffic calming measures <br />being placed adjacent to their property will be required to approve of the Traffic Calming Plan. <br />This includes those residents that are impacted by parking restrictions due to traffic calming <br />devices. If a traffic calming project is considered controversial or has major impacts in traffic <br />circulation, City staff may present it to the Planning Commission for approval. <br /> <br />City of San Leandro, Engineering and Transportation Page 6 of 23 <br />4/20/06 NEIGHBORHOOD TRAFFIC CALMING PROGRAM <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.