Laserfiche WebLink
<br />California, Berkeley and Basin Research Associates, San Leandro was also consulted. I <br /> <br />The Native American HeritageCommission (NAHC) was contacted for a search of the Sacred Lands <br />Inventory on file with the Commission (December 8, 2004). The NAHC responded on December <br />28, 2004 indicating that a search had failed to indicate the presence of Native American cultural <br />resources in or adjacent to the project area. <br /> <br />No prehistoric archaeological sites have recorded in or adjacent to the proposed project. <br /> <br />No historic era sites have been recorded in or adjacentto the proposed project. <br /> <br />No local, state or federal historically or architecturally significant archaeological sites, structures, <br />landmarks or points of interest have been identified or observed in or adjacent to the project. <br /> <br />Systematic archaeological inventories did not note any surface indications of either prehistoric or <br />historic archaeological resources. <br /> <br />There appears to be no potential for exposing prehistoric Native American and Historic era <br />archaeological resources at the project location. Archival research indicates that the proposed project <br />was included within: (1) several water lots used for oyster beds that were later engineered to develop <br />Oyster Slough and an associated levee through dredging and filling; and, (2) a historic landfill that <br />was used until 1990. <br /> <br />There appears to be no potential that previously undiscovered resources could be exposed during <br />construction excavations. <br /> <br />Potentially <br />Significant <br />Impact <br /> <br />Potentially <br />Significant unless <br />Mitigation <br />Incorporated <br /> <br />Less than <br />Significant <br />Impact <br /> <br />No <br />Impact <br /> <br />VI. GEOLOGY AND SOILS ~- Would the project: <br /> <br />a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial <br />adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or <br />death involving: <br /> <br />i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on <br />the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning <br />Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based <br />on other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to <br />Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42. <br /> <br />ii) Strong seismic ground shaking? <br /> <br />o <br /> <br />o <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />o <br /> <br />o <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />o <br /> <br />o <br /> <br />I Specialized listings consulted include the Historic Properties Directory for Alameda County with the most <br />recent updates of the National Register of Historic Places, California Historical Landmarks, and California Points of <br />Historical Interest as well as other evaluations of properties reviewed by the State of California Office of Historic <br />Preservation. Other sources consulted include: the California History Plan; California Inventoryof Historic Resources; <br />California Points of Historical Interest; Five Views: An Ethnic Sites Survey for California; and, Historic Civil <br />Engineering Landmarks of San Francisco and Northern California. <br /> <br />Y4204IS.OO693.doc - 4/5107 <br /> <br />-20- <br />