Laserfiche WebLink
<br />The use of shallow barges that would sit on the bottom of Oyster Bay Slough during low tide would <br />not be expected to affect existing drainage patterns of the slough. The project would not alter the <br />course of any stream or river. <br /> <br />Construction of the trail portion of the project could slightly increase the volume of surface runoff, <br />since the trail would add impervious surface to the top of the levee north of Oyster Bay Slough. The <br />amount of increased runoff would be considered a less-than-significant impact. <br /> <br />Water surface elevations in the channel are controlled by tide level in San Francisco Bay. In the <br />vicinity of the project site, the FEMA mapped 1 DO-year flood hazard zone is contained within the <br />banks of Oyster Bay Slough (FEMA, 2002). The only portion of the project that could affect the <br />flood zone is the foundation support piers for the bridge. No portions of the proposed trail <br />connection would be located within the 1 DO-year flood hazard zone. Therefore, the 1 DO-year flood <br />elevation and the elevation of the I DO-year high tide are the hydraulic characteristics of the system of <br />greatest concern when evaluating the elevation of the existing and proposed bridge components. <br /> <br />The bridge structure would be supported by three piers consisting offour-foot (1.2-meter) diameter <br />cast-in-steel-shell concrete piles. The prefabricated bridge truss would come with steel decking that <br />would provide the formwork for the concrete deck. After the trusses are in place, lightweight <br />concrete would be poured in the steel decking and finished in place. The total floodplain <br />encroachment proposed is placement of these three four-foot (l.2-meter) diameter piles in the tidal <br />inlet. <br /> <br />Since the channel hydraulics are dominated by tidal levels in the Bay (and not backwater effects <br />associated with storm water runoff), water levels in the channel will continue to remain in relative <br />equilibrium with tidal levels in the Bay, regardless of encroachments in the channel. Under existing <br />conditions, there are no substantial inputs to the channel (other than tidal inflow). <br /> <br />As shown in Table 2, the 1 DO-year flood hazard level and the 1 DO-year high tide elevations are <br />substantially below the surface elevation of the proposed bridge deck. <br /> <br />Table 2: Elevations of Proposed Bridge, 1 00- Year Flood and Tide <br /> <br />13.51 <br /> <br />FEMA lOO-year Flood Hazard <br />Elevation (feet NA VD 88) <br /> <br />9.692 <br /> <br />Corps 1 DO-year High Tide <br />Elevation (feet NA VD 88) <br /> <br />9.593 <br /> <br />Lowest Bridge Underside <br />Elevation (feet NA VD 88) <br /> <br />NA VD = North American Vertical Datum <br /> <br />1 Mark Thomas and Company, Inc., 2005, Vertical Datum data page, Bay Trail Bridge, City of San Leandro, 25 January. <br />2 National Flood Insurance Program, 2000, Flood Insurance Rate Map, Community Panel Number 060013 OOOIC, 9 <br />February. <br />3 U.S. Anny Corps of Engineers, 1984, San Francisco Bay Tidal Stage vs. Frequency Study, October. <br /> <br />Y4204IS.OO693.doc - 4/5107 <br /> <br />-29- <br />