Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Page 27: Mitigation Measure N-2 <br />This mitigation is inadequate. Specific erosion control measures, performance crite~ <br />and implementation schedule and roles should be discussed. ~ <br /> <br />#2-12 <br /> <br />Page 27: Mitigation Measure IV-3 (c) <br />This mitigation measure is inadequate. Avoidance of shrub habitat will not be feasible <br />during trail construction. Construction should not be permitted during breeding season as <br />it will be impossible to protect nests from the construction zone. Construction will occur <br />within 50 feet of breeding habitat. <br /> <br />#2-13 <br /> <br />Page 31: Geology and Soil <br />Under Item VI (b), Alternative #1 would cause substantial soil erosion by attempting to <br />fill into sloping areas adjacent to salt marsh wetland habitat and retaining fill materials by <br />wooden retaining wall. The preparation of Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan, <br />without continuous monitoring and commitment of sponsoring agency for long-term <br />maintenance of the retaining wall, is inadequate to prevent deterioration of the retaining <br />wall. In addition, long term maintenance of the trail would be necessary to <br />reducecontaminated runoff, including potential pollutants emitted by sanitary district <br />maintenance vehicles. <br /> <br />#2-14 <br /> <br />Page 34: Mitigation Measure VII-I. ~ <br />Include Personal Protective Equipment in Health and Safety Plan. Include OSHA . #2-15 <br />standards and protection performance criteria. <br /> <br />Page 34: Mitigation Measure VII-2. <br />Mitigation Measure is inadequate. Specify what measures shall be taken, by whom,~ #2-16 <br />when, how, and where and discuss performance criteria. ~ <br /> <br />Page 35-36: There is a redundant set of paragraphs. ==:J <br /> <br />Page 37: There is no discussion of the impacts associated with checklist item VIII (~ <br /> <br />Page 39: Land Use and Planning <br />The Alternative #1 project is located on land owned by and within the land-use <br />jurisdiction of the Port of Oakland. The subject area is within an area designated as part <br />of the Oakland Metropolitan International Airport. As such, the Port of Oakland <br />exercises land-use planning subject to grant-assurances restrictions of the Federal <br />Aviation Administration (the "FAA"). Moreover, pursuant to the City of Oakland <br />Charter, any lease of or construction upon land within the jurisdiction of the Port of <br />Oakland must be approved and permitted by the Board of Port Commissioners. The <br />granting of a building permit under Oakland City Charter Section 708 is a discretionary <br />action subject to the requirements ofCEQA. <br /> <br />#2-17 <br /> <br />#2-18 <br /> <br />#2-19 <br /> <br />The Alternative #1 project is subject to FAA restrictions and the Port of Oakland grant of <br />building permit or land control. The project sponsor has neither proposed to comply with <br />FAA restrictions nor obtain land use permission or control from the Port of Oakland. To <br /> <br />86893.vl <br />