My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2A Public Hearing 2007 0709
CityHall
>
City Clerk
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2007
>
Packet 2007 0709
>
2A Public Hearing 2007 0709
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/5/2007 2:06:52 PM
Creation date
7/5/2007 2:06:39 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CM City Clerk-City Council
CM City Clerk-City Council - Document Type
Staff Report
Document Date (6)
7/9/2007
Retention
PERM
Document Relationships
_CC Agenda 2007 0709
(Reference)
Path:
\City Clerk\City Council\Agenda Packets\2007\Packet 2007 0709
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
91
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Excerpt from the Board of Zoning Adjustments Meeting Minutes June 7, 2007 <br />Minute No. 2007-11 Page 3 of8 <br />Peter Blied, Red Mountain Retail Group, 1234 East 17th Street, Santa Ana, stated they <br />were the property owners who acquired it in 2005. They specialized in retail <br />redevelopment of existing retail centers. This property was occupied by the first Lucky <br />Store in the 1930s and became Albertson's. No one wanted a vacant store, surrounded by <br />chain link and barbed wire, sitting in the middle of downtown. It was a great site for a <br />mixed use opportunity. However, the residential market was not as strong as it should be <br />for a development of approximately 120 condominium units. They originally had a Rite <br />Aid signed for this property, but they were told that a grocery store, such as a Trader <br />Joe's or Andronico's, was preferred for this site. Now, they have a grocery store that is <br />interested in the property and wanted to be in the middle of downtown. After they had <br />submitted an application for a CUP, another moratorium was instituted. The property cost <br />them approximately $40,000 per month, which was difficult because they were not a <br />large company. They had offered to enter into a development agreement where mixed use <br />could occur on this property when appropriate in the future, but staff showed no interest. <br />A small survey was done on line by a local person and 87 of the 100 people who <br />responded were in favor of Grocery Outlet locating on this property. He introduced their <br />attorney, Jeff Goldfarb. <br /> <br />Jeff Goldfarb, attorney, 611 Anton Boulevard, Costa Mesa, stated that staffs conclusion <br />in the report was at odds with key requirements in the city's zoning ordinance. A <br />supermarket was defined as selling a wide variety of food and household items with a <br />community-wide market area. Grocery Outlet would not have a community-wide market <br />area, as a market analysis prepared by a division of Pitney Bowes confirmed, which was <br />attached to a letter provided to the Board Members. The study showed that the "trade <br />area" (market area) encompassed a two-mile radius within the proposed store's site. <br />"Overall sales beyond the trade area are projected to be just ten percent." This meant that <br />a full 90 percent of the sales would be within the two-mile trade area (or market area). <br />The Grocery Outlet did not have a community-wide market area and should not be <br />classified as a supermarket under the City's own definition. <br /> <br />The City's General Plan stated that "those uses primarily served the surrounding <br />residential area, usually within a radius of a mile or two." Since the Grocery Outlet was a <br />neighborhood grocery store, as defined in the city code, it was a permitted use. As a <br />permitted use, it was exempt from the TOD moratorium, which was the second <br />moratorium placed on the property. The two stores, mentioned by staff that were deemed <br />supermarkets, must have a community-wide market area, which was the only way, under <br />the city's code, they could be considered supermarkets. <br /> <br />Member Daly asked where the closest Grocery Outlet was located. How many outlets <br />were there in the Bay Area? <br /> <br />Mr. Goldfarb replied that the closest Grocery Outlet was located in Oakland. <br /> <br />Chuck Moore, Vice President for Construction and Planning, 300 Romay Court, <br />Danville, stated that he was with Lucky Stores for 25 years and had actually worked in <br />the building on the property under consideration. The corporation was located in <br />Berkeley and three of the stores were owned by the store. All others were operated by <br />individuals, usually a husband and wife team. Company stores were in Oakland and <br />Berkeley and owner-operated stores were located in San Pablo and Vallejo. They <br />operated in six western states. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.