Laserfiche WebLink
<br />DRAFT MINUTES Page 14 <br />City of San Leandro City Council, San Leandro Hillside Geologic Hazard Abatement District, and San Leandro <br />Redevelopment Agency Joint Meeting-July 16, 2007 <br /> <br />Vice Mayor Grant asked whether a minor change to the language in Section 11 (b) of the <br />ordinance to read, "Each entity which is to replace a prior like entity," might help to <br />address the concerns expressed about this section. <br /> <br />Councilmember Stephens complimented staff for bringing the ordinance back with the <br />improvements and compromises, recognizing that it was a difficult task. <br />Councilmember Stephens referred to Section 6( c), asking how many non-profit service <br />contractors are covered under this section. Mr. Jermanis replied that there was one. <br />Councilmember Stephens asked why the ordinance differentiates between for-profit and <br />non-profit businesses. <br /> <br />Mayor Santos commented that non-profits often work within very slim margins, yet <br />most pay above the proposed living wage. Mayor Santos recalled that during the <br />Council's review of the Housing Element, it was reported that a wage of $25 per hour <br />was necessary in order to afford housing in San Leandro. He noted that under the <br />proposed ordinance, a two-income household could earn about $25 per hour. <br /> <br />Mr. Jermanis noted that Councilmember Stephens raised the same question about for- <br />profits vs. non-profits with the Finance Committee. Mr. Jermanis pointed out that the <br />non-profit agencies appeal to the City Council through the Human Services <br />Commission for financial support, and few receive the amount of funding from the City <br />that would require compliance with the ordinance. Mr. Jermanis addressed the question <br />raised by Councilmember Souza regarding time off for part-time workers, commenting <br />that part-time employees receive a portion of the 12 days per month that full-time <br />workers receive, and all of the ordinances that the City reviewed had this provision. <br /> <br />Regarding further amendments to the ordinance, Mr. Jermanis suggested that the <br />Council accept the amendment to Section 9 of the ordinance to change the wording <br />from "license" to "license agreement," and direct staff to develop administrative <br />guidelines to clarify some of the issues that were raised tonight, such as tip credit. <br /> <br />Councilmember ProIa, the maker of the motion, and Councilmember Gregory, the <br />seconder of the motion, accepted the change suggested by Mr. Jermanis. <br /> <br />Councilmember Stephens commented that he still has not received a satisfactory answer <br />about the distinction between for-profit and non-profit organizations. He pointed out <br />that employees of non-profits need places to live, food, time off, and a quality of life, <br />just as employees of for-profits do. Councilmember Stephens asked about the viability <br />of the LINKS Shuttle under this ordinance. Mr. Jermanis indicated that the LINKS <br />personnel are receiving the equivalent of the proposed living wage or greater. <br />Councilmember Stephens asked about employees of the golf course. Mr. Jermanis <br />commented that all of the operations at the Shoreline-Marina area would not be subject <br />to the ordinance until such time as changes or renewals to their agreements occur. <br /> <br />Councilmember Stephens asked who has standing under the provision in Section 13(a) <br />of the ordinance. Ms. Williams replied that any employee who feels aggrieved by not <br />