My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
3A Public Hearing 2008 0122
CityHall
>
City Clerk
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2008
>
Packet 2008 0122
>
3A Public Hearing 2008 0122
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/22/2008 10:22:05 AM
Creation date
1/22/2008 10:22:03 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CM City Clerk-City Council
CM City Clerk-City Council - Document Type
Staff Report
Document Date (6)
1/22/2008
Retention
PERM
Document Relationships
_CC Agenda 2008 0122
(Reference)
Path:
\City Clerk\City Council\Agenda Packets\2008\Packet 2008 0122
MO 2008-004
(Reference)
Path:
\City Clerk\City Council\Minute Orders\2008
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
102
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Davidon Homes, July 2007 HortScience, Inc. <br />Tree Report, Woodside Apartments Page 3 .~..., <br />Purple leaf plums had performed moderately well at the site. Most were below the 6" <br />threshold for inclusion in the survey, however those that were surveyed typically had fair <br />form and structure. Many were growing amongst, and being shaded by adjacent coast <br />redwoods, producing trees with supressed forms and/or leans. <br />Table 1. Tree condition 8 frequency of occurrence. <br />Woodside Apartments, San Leandro <br />Common Name Scientific Name Condition Rating No. of <br />Fair Good trees <br />(3) (4.5) <br />Italian alder Alnus rhombifolia 1 - 1 <br />Sweet gum Liquidambar sfyraciflua 11 11 22 <br />.African fem pine Podocarpus gracilor 1 - 1 <br />Purple leaf plum Prunus cerasifera 'Atropurpurea' 5 1 6 <br />Black locust Robinia pseudoacacia 1 - 1 <br />Coast redwood Sequoia sempervirens 2 10 12 <br />Total 21 22 43 <br /> 49% 51% 100% <br />Suitability for Preservation <br />Before evaluating the impacts that will occur during development, it is important to <br />consider the quality of the tree resource itself, and the potential for individual trees to <br />function well over an extended length of time. Trees that are preserved on development <br />sites must be carefully selected to make sure that they may survive development <br />impacts, adapt to a new environment and perform well in the landscape. <br />For trees growing in open fields, away from areas where people and property are <br />present, structural defects and/or poor health presents a low risk of damage or injury if <br />they fail. However, we must be concerned about safety in use areas. Therefore, where <br />development encroaches into existing plantings, we must consider their structural stability <br />as well as their potential to grow and thrive in a new environment. Where development <br />will not occur, the normal life cycles of decline, structural failure and death should be <br />allowed to continue. <br />Evaluation of suitability for preservation considers several factors: <br />Tree health <br />Healthy, vigorous trees are better able to tolerate impacts such as root injury, <br />demolition of existing structures, changes in soil grade and moisture, and soil <br />compaction than are non-vigorous trees. <br />Structural integrity <br />Trees with significant amounts of wood decay and other structural defects that <br />cannot be corrected are likely to fail. Such trees should not be preserved in <br />areas where damage to people or property is likely. <br />Species response <br />There is a wide variation in the response of individual species to construction <br />impacts and changes in the environment. In our experience, for example sweet <br />gums are intolerant of root loss. In contrast, coast redwoods have a good <br />tolerance to site disturbance. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.