Laserfiche WebLink
Davidon Homes, July 2007 HortScience, Inc. <br />Tree Report, Woodside Apartments Page 1 <br />Introduction and Overview <br />Davidon Homes is planning to convert an existing apartment complex to condominiums. <br />The property is located at 235 Haas Avenue, in San Leandro. As part of the conversion <br />process, new landscaping will be installed and trees requiring maintenance or removal <br />will be addressed. HortSdence, Inc. was asked to prepare a Tree Management Plan for <br />the site for review by the City of San Leandro. <br />This report provides the following information: <br />1. An evaluation of the health and structural condition of the trees from a visual <br />inspection. <br />2. Recommendations for tree maintenance, either pruning or removal. <br />Survey Methods <br />Trees were surveyed on April 20, 2007. All trees with diameters of 6° or greater were <br />included. The survey procedure consisted of the following steps: <br />1. Identifying the tree as to spe+des; <br />2. Tagging each tree with an identifying number and recording its location on a <br />map; <br />3. Measuring the trunk diameter at a point 54° above grade; <br />4: Evaluating the health and structural condition using a scale of 1 - 5: <br />5 - A healthy, vigorous tree, reasonably free of signs and symptoms of <br />disease, with good structure and form typical of the spades. <br />4 -Tree with slight decline in vigor, small amount of twig dieback, minor <br />structural defects that could be corrected. <br />3 -Tree with moderate vigor, moderate twig and small branch dieback, <br />thinning of crown, poor leaf color, moderate structural defects that <br />might be mitigated with regular care. <br />2 - Tree in dedine, epicormic growth, extensive diebadc of medium to large <br />branches, signficant structural defects that cannot be abated. <br />i -Tree in severe dedine, diebadc of scaffold branches and/or trunk; most <br />of foliage from epicormics; extensive structural defects that cannot be <br />abated. <br />5. Rating the suitability for preservation as'good°, 'moderate° or 'poor". <br />Suitability for preservation considers the health, age and strudx~ral condition <br />of the tree spades, and its potential to remain an asset to the site for years <br />to come. <br />Good: Trees with good health and structural stability that have the <br />potential for longevity at the site. <br />Moderate: Trees with somewhat declining health and/or structural <br />defects than can be abated with treatment. The tree will <br />require more intense management and rrronitoring, and may <br />have shorter life span than those in 'good' category. <br />Poor. Trees in poor health or with significant structural defects that <br />cannot be mitigated. Tree is expected to continue to dedine, <br />.regardless of treatment. The species or individual tree may <br />have characteristics that are undesirable for landscapes, and <br />generally are unsuited for use areas. <br />