My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
3A Public Hearing 2008 0707
CityHall
>
City Clerk
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2008
>
Packet 2008 0707
>
3A Public Hearing 2008 0707
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/3/2008 4:49:18 PM
Creation date
7/3/2008 4:49:17 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CM City Clerk-City Council
CM City Clerk-City Council - Document Type
Staff Report
Document Date (6)
7/7/2008
Retention
PERM
Document Relationships
_CC Agenda 2008 0707
(Reference)
Path:
\City Clerk\City Council\Agenda Packets\2008\Packet 2008 0707
MO 2008-020
(Reference)
Path:
\City Clerk\City Council\Minute Orders\2008
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
61
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
the maximum height is 50 feet tall (Zoning Code Article 6 Commercial and Professional <br />Districts). <br />The exterior design of the proposed second unit would be stucco to match the existing texture <br />and color of the one-story single-family home. The roof would be a gabled-roof design with <br />composition shingles to match the existing home. The windows would be dual-paned with <br />simulated divided panes. <br />Landscaping, Fencing, and Paving <br />The existing front yard setback is comprised of a combination of turf, trimmed shrubs and trees. <br />The easterly side setback, not visible from the street, would be finished with mulch or gravel. <br />The westerly side setback would not be landscaped to accommodate a concrete driveway serving <br />the parking at the rear. The remaining area at the rear that would not be paved would be <br />landscaped with turf/groundcover and trees. The existing wood perimeter fencing would be <br />retained. It is approximately six feet tall Any fencing damaged during the construction would be <br />replaced with similar fencing. The existing paving is in good condition. The proposed additional <br />paving for the driveway and parking areas at the rear of the property is proposed to be standard <br />with lamp black color additive with a broom finish so as to closely match the existing paving. <br />STAFF ANALYSIS <br />Conditional Use Permit for Substandard Lot <br />Section 4-1650 of the Zoning Code requires that any use other than asingle-family residence on a <br />substandard lot undergo a conditional use permit review process. This is to ensure that small lots <br />are evaluated to determine their ability to adequately accommodate the proposed projects other than <br />a single-family home and that the project conforms to the basic setback, coverage, height and off- <br />street parking requirements. <br />In this case, the lot is 40 feet wide and 130 feet deep. While the width of the lot is 10 feet less than <br />required in the DA-3 District, its depth is longer than a standard 50 by 100 foot lot, by 30 feet. The <br />total area of this lot is approximately 5,200 square feet which exceeds the 5,000 square foot <br />minimum lot area in the DA-3 District. The additional depth of the lot and the rectangular shape, <br />make the proposed duplex a viable project to construct on the narrow lot. The proposed duplex <br />complies with all setbacks, lot coverage, height, and covered off-street parking development <br />standards for the DA-3 District. <br />Although the DA-3 District is lenient and relaxed with its zoning requirements, adequate <br />consideration to maintain appropriate setbacks and scale of the duplex was given so that the <br />proposal should blend in and have no impact upon the existing adjacent development and the <br />existing neighborhood. <br />Architecture/Design-Site Plan Review <br />The exterior design of the proposed two-story additional unit would blend in with the existing <br />single-story unit on the property. The use of similar pitched roof design, matching windows and <br />trim, and matching exterior colors on the project would give the units on the lot a cohesive <br />appearance. Furthermore, the placement of the two-story components behind the existing dwelling <br />unit is one method in deemphasizing the height, bulk and mass of the proposed two-story unit. <br />Board of Zoning Adjustments Staff Report March 6, 2006 <br />PLN2008-00003 Page 3 of 5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.