My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
8A Consent 2008 0902
CityHall
>
City Clerk
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2008
>
Packet 2008 0902
>
8A Consent 2008 0902
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/29/2008 9:03:21 AM
Creation date
8/29/2008 9:03:15 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CM City Clerk-City Council
CM City Clerk-City Council - Document Type
Draft Minutes
Document Date (6)
7/21/2008
Retention
PERM
Document Relationships
_CC Agenda 2008 0902
(Reference)
Path:
\City Clerk\City Council\Agenda Packets\2008\Packet 2008 0902
Minutes 2008 0721
(Superseded by)
Path:
\City Clerk\City Council\Minutes\2008
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
DRAFT MINUTES <br /> Page 12 <br />City of San Leandro City Council, San Leandro Hillside Geologic Hazard Abatement District, and San Leandro <br />July 21, 2008 <br />Redevelopment Agency Joint Meeting <br /> <br /> <br />Mr. Jermanis clarified that these proclamations are ceremonial, and do not have the <br />same impact as an ordinance or resolution; however it appears to add value to the <br />recipients for the documents to come from the entire Council. <br /> <br />Councilmember Starosciak commented that she experienced embarrassment by the <br />recent two-day . She stated that the Council was <br />sharply criticized in the newspaper, but had no say in the matter. Councilmember <br />from <br />the wording of proclamations, to avoid future criticism and embarrassment. <br /> <br />Councilmember Gregory concurred with Vice Mayor Stephens and Councilmember <br />Prola that the proclamations he has seen have been mostly benign, and he did not <br />perceive that the situation caused acute embarrassment for the <br />Council or the Mayor. <br /> <br />Mayor Santos noted that the majority of the Council was in favor of retaining the <br />current wording and process; however, he assured the Council that he would bring <br />potentially controversial items to the full Council for review. <br /> <br />No action taken. <br /> <br />C. Matter of Consideration of Placing Potential Ballot Measures on the November 4, 2008 <br />Election Ballot (provides an overview of the three proposed revenue enhancements: 1) <br />modernization of Utility Users Tax (UUT) Ordinance; 2) clarification of the purpose of <br />the Emergency Communication System Access Fee (911 Fee) Ordinance; and 3) Police <br />Services Parcel Tax). <br /> <br />Mr. Jermanis provided background on the item. Mr. Carter gave additional detail on the <br />proposed ballot measures for modernization of the UUT Ordinance and clarification of <br />the purpose of the 911 Fee Ordinance, and the reasons for recommending their <br />placement on the November ballot. <br /> <br />Staff responded to questions from the Council. <br /> <br />Councilmember Gregory suggested that the ballot language specifically state that the <br />measures would have a neutral revenue impact. <br /> <br />Mr. Jermanis indicated that if the Council is interested in further consideration of any of <br />the ballot measures, a special meeting could be held on July 28 to consider the measures <br />for placement on the November ballot. <br /> <br /> <br />Vice Mayor Stephens reminded the Council that a previous Public Safety Parcel Tax <br />failed in better economic times. He stated that he is in favor of pursuing the UUT and <br />9-1-1 Fee, and suggested that the Council approach them incrementally. <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.