Laserfiche WebLink
Reformation of RAC 2 October 20, 2008 <br />BACKGROUND <br />Although RACs are not required by law, they provide a valuable source of community input for <br />matters ultimately to be considered by the City Council. The Joint and WSL RACs were <br />essential to the prioritizing of the goals, objectives and programs used to implement the <br />Redevelopment Plans. Both RACs advised the agency on Zoning Code changes within the <br />Project Area, the Assembly Use Overlay District and the creation of the Commercial <br />Rehabilitation Program. <br />The primary function of the Joint RAC was to put into action the Redevelopment Plan by <br />working with staff to create aFive-Year Implementation Plan. The Joint RAC, through the <br />Implementation Plan, created the framework for the following projects and programs: <br />• Expansion of the Marina Auto Mall <br />• The Redevelopment of the Islander Motel <br />• The Implementation of East 14th Street South Area Strategy <br />• Renovation of the Bayfair Center <br />The WSL RAC worked with staff to create the Five-Year Implementation Plans which were <br />adopted by the Redevelopment Agency in 1999 and 2004. One program that was an outgrowth of <br />the WSL RAC involvement in the Implementation Plans is the LINKS shuttle. The creation of <br />this shuttle was a response to a shortage of public transportation in West San Leandro and an <br />expressed desire for adequate public transportation by the West San Leandro business <br />community. <br />In addition, the WSL RAC advised the Redevelopment Agency on: <br />• The MacArthur Boulevard Streetscape Improvement Plans <br />• The Doolittle Drive Improvement Plans <br />Now that these objectives, goals and programs have been established and priorities determined, <br />the monitoring functions that the RACs serve duplicate the efforts of the Planning Commission <br />and the City Council Business and Housing Development Committee. <br />The declining number of issues to be reviewed by the RACs, the difficulty of supporting the <br />RACs with current staffing levels, and difficulty in filling the current vacancies, are additional <br />reasons the Rules and Communications Committee and staff recommend dissolving the Joint and <br />WSL RACs. <br />Staff and the Rules and Communications Committee are also recommending formation of a new <br />RAC consisting of individuals from all three project areas as well as a housing representative in <br />order to reposition the RACs to continue to provide valuable input, given the above challenges. <br />The reformed RAC would have 10 members, made up of stakeholders -one property owner, one <br />business owner and one resident who lives within 500 feet of each of the three Project Areas plus <br />one stakeholder representing the housing community (i.e., non-profit housing agency, multi- <br />family property owner, or multi-family residential developer). The proposed 10 member RAC <br />should provide valuable and representative input, while remaining a manageable size that can be <br />educated on the specifics of the Project Areas. <br />