Laserfiche WebLink
Excerpts of the Draft Planning Commission Regular Meeting Minutes November 13, 2008 <br />Agenda No. 08-21 Page S of 7 <br />sink and stove, but it provided an additional 105 square feet of useable space, in which case the loft would <br />not be needed as a sleeping area. He said he understands that Dr. Friend's architect rejected the plan; <br />perhaps the plan can be revisited. The implications of this matter are far-reaching and go to the core of the <br />Historic Preservation Ordinance. One small exception inevitably will lead to others. The need here is to <br />prevent erosion of the ordinance and make a decision in the best interests of the historic properties we have <br />in San Leandro. With that, he asked that the Planning Commission not approve the request to increase the <br />height of the Blacksmith's Shop. <br />David Gozum, owner of the end unit at 465 West Estudillo Avenue, said his condominium is one of those <br />behind the Blacksmith's Shop. He said his concerns include the fact that the Blacksmith's Shop is already <br />within five inches of fence line for the condos. When you look up on the roof on the side where the gutters <br />are, it passes the top of the fence line; if the gutters become damaged, water will enter the condo property. <br />Privacy issues are another concern, in that the second -floor windows are directly across from the back <br />window of the Blacksmith's Shop. Increasing the height of the building and enlarging the window would <br />make it even worse. He also said that in the past there had been complaints of disturbances from the <br />property. He agrees with Mr. Reicker, and would like to see the former Daniel Best Home Blacksmith's <br />Shop to remain as it is, protecting the integrity and character of this historical place. <br />Mr. Bolinger said that there is more than five inches between the building and the property line that also <br />has to be constructed as a one-hour wall for that specific reason. The window that is being enlarged does <br />not face Mr. Gozum's property, but directly into the back of one of the other buildings on Dr. Friend's <br />property. There are no windows facing his property at all. He pointed out, too, that even if this building is <br />raised 1'/2 feet, it still would have the lowest roof on the property. The house may well have been designed <br />by an architect, but not the outbuildings. They have all been replaced, in total, over the years. This is all <br />modern framing, sitting on modern concrete. He said he understands the issue of integrity, but disagrees that <br />the proposal somehow destroys integrity in making the Blacksmith's Shop a viable, usable structure. <br />Chair Dlugosh asked whether these structures were in place as is when the site was declared a historical <br />resource. <br />Mr. Bolinger did not know, but he repeated that the framing is modern and none of it has the old framing <br />from the original buildings — not one piece of wood. All of these have been replaced within the last 20 <br />years, and there have been attempts to restore some of the elements that would have been there. He also <br />denied rejecting any usable new floor plan; what he explained to the planner, he said, was these floor plans <br />exist, and to change them would require gutting the inside of the buildings to add area, take up the existing <br />laundry room area. Gutting the buildings and starting over would have a bigger impact than the changes <br />proposed. San Leandro's planning guidelines allow for this type of improvement, if done properly. He <br />reiterated that the changes would not compromise integrity — the building will just be a foot taller — and he <br />asserts that standing on the ground outside, no one would even notice the difference. The proposal also <br />represents a way for Dr. Friend to continue to maintain the property. <br />Commissioner Ponder asked how gutting the building would have greater impact. <br />Mr. Bolinger said it is concrete slab and all pipe inside the slab now and drainage lines in place for the <br />sink, washer and dryer. Moving things around would require gutting out the walls. The plumbing would no <br />longer would serve any purpose, and the slab would have to be cut to install drain lines — toilet, tub, sinks, <br />washers all would have to be dealt with if the place were to be gutted and redesigned. This seemed <br />unnecessary when there is an easy way to handle it. <br />Commissioner Collier, calling on her experience as a building contractor, said she does not think it would <br />be so difficult to put a kitchen sink drain into a washer drain and use the current laundry room as a small <br />kitchen. It is only a strip galley kitchen now, which would be more than adequate in a room the size of the <br />current laundry. She appreciates that it is a total change from what has been proposed, but considers it <br />probably a more feasible use of the property versus an extremely small livable space in a loft, with difficult <br />access. Left as storage, the loft could even be accessed via an outside staircase, creating even more room by <br />removing the circular staircase inside. <br />