Laserfiche WebLink
City of Sr~n Le~l~dr-~~ <br />Civic C~~iltc~r, t;;~i F. 1-trh SfrF~t_~l <br />Spin Lc~~~ndro, C~r~liirxnia ~).(7 <br />t)ctober ] . ?008 <br />Honorable Mayor and City C ouncil <br />City of San Leandro <br />83S I. 14`x' Street <br />San Leandro, CA 94;77 <br />Dear Mavor Santos and Council Members: <br />As requested by the City Council at the September 4, 2UU7 City Council meeting, the Recreation <br />and Park Commission has researched the feasibility of building a dog park in San Leandro. It is <br />the recommendation of~ the Recreation and Park Commission that the City Council consider <br />using park development fees to build a dog park with areas for both small and large dogs at the <br />Marina Shoreline in a section that is currently used as an off leash area for dogs located just <br />south of the F.BDA de-chlorination building. This recammendation is a result of one year of <br />thorough, thoughtful research and discussion' with community members, Four Paws Society (a <br />local non profit pet advocacy group), other agencies managing dog parks and city staff from <br />various departments. <br />Throughout the past year the Recreation and Park Commission held nine Commission meetings <br />(one of which was publicized in the newspaper in addition to regular postings}; one community <br />meeting on a Saturday at a potential dog park site; surveyed 15 agencies managing dog parks <br />reviewing, their design. size, cost to build, cast to maintain and issues of concern past-opening of <br />the park: worked with 1-'our Paws Society on design, location and issues generated by their <br />community survey and received design and maintenance input and cast estimates from the <br />Public Works and Engineering and Transportation Departments, Consistently through our <br />meetings and research we heard nothing but community support and need for a dog park. Every <br />agency said that their dog park was the mast heavily used park. <br />Staff; working with 1''our Paws Society and input iiom the community from meetings and <br />sun°eys. have prepared a conceptual design including a preferred location. The preferred <br />location is due to its proximity to parking and restrooms and distance from neighbors. "hhe <br />conceptual design includes a 1.3 acre fenced, gated park with separate small and large dog areas, <br />water, a shade structure, benches and garbage cans. The ground cover would be decomposed <br />granite which .allow°s drainage, reduces the need for mowing or irrigating and is a nice surface for <br />dugs. <br />Attached is a copy of the conceptual designs as well as three cost estimates developed by° the <br />Engineering and Transportation Department. The cast variance per estimate is dependent on the <br />amount of decomposed granite. Option #1 has a 3'perimeter of decomposed granite around the <br />fence to lessen the need for hand weeding along the fence (a high maintenance cast). Option #2 <br />~i~n1' S.111If~p, ~A111'~~i <br />rt~ 4 nurr~ il: ~urlcn~~ G. (~r:mt; ~AlirhnP•~ J. C;rr•~~ri~~; Iini I'nil,r. <br />I li.in,i ~~1 tir,u~d; ~c~~rr K~ 5i~rntir~,~1,: Kfl~ ~4chhC`~c. <br />