My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
RDA Reso 2004-005
CityHall
>
City Clerk
>
City Council
>
Resolutions
>
2004
>
RDA Reso 2004-005
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2009 1:15:52 PM
Creation date
1/26/2009 1:15:49 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CM City Clerk-City Council
CM City Clerk-City Council - Document Type
Resolution
Document Date (6)
5/3/2004
Retention
PERM
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
66
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
04. SB 1045 also permits the Redevelopment Plan to be amended to add one year on to the <br />duration of the Redevelopment Plan effectiveness and on to the period for collection of tax <br />increment revenues and the repayment of debt. <br />Agency Tax Sharing Obligations <br />AB1290 Tax Sharing. Under the 1994 amendments to redevelopment law known as <br />AB1290, any extension of certain fiscal limits in then-existing redevelopment plans without <br />pass-through agreements triggered a statutory pass-through payment schedule, however since <br />the Project Area was established in 1999 (post-AB1290) it is automatically subject to the <br />statutory pass-through provisions of AB1290. <br />AB1290 Statutory Pass-Throughs. The AB 1290 formula is set forth in Section 33607.7 <br />of the Redevelopment Law and, to the extent incorporated therein, in Section 33607.5 of the <br />Redevelopment Law, and is referred to herein and in the Indenture as the "Statutory Pass- <br />Throughs". <br />Under the Statutory Pass-Throughs the Agency is to pay to the affected taxing entities <br />percentages of tax increment generated with respect to the increase in assessed valuation of the <br />Project Area following certain years. The allocation of pass-through payments to each taxing <br />entity is based on the allocation factor assigned to each entity by the County. <br />Approximately 20% of the tax increment in the Project Area is paid to taxing entities <br />during the initial ten years of the Project Area. In year ten, an additional base threshold is <br />established and another payment stream is added equal to 16.8% of tax increment over the <br />year-ten threshold. In year thirty a third base threshold is established and payments equal to <br />11.2% of revenue over that threshold are added to the payments made to taxing entities. <br />The allocation ofpass-through payments to each taxing entity is based on an allocation <br />factor that is assigned to each entity by the County. The County calculates an additional factor <br />for most non-school entities that is the percentage of the entity's revenue to be paid into the <br />Educational Revenue Augmentation Fund ("ERAF"). It is the Agency's practice to pay to each <br />taxing entity the entity's full allocation factor, including the percentage that the entity would <br />pay to ERAF. See "ERAF Obligations" below. <br />According to the Fiscal Consultant, over the life of the project area, the Agency expects <br />to pass approximately 30% of its tax increment through to taxing entities. These payments are <br />a prior obligation of the Agency and are paid by the Agency from tax increment receipts before <br />payments on the Bonds. <br />ERAF Obligations <br />In connection with its approval of the budget for the 1992-93, 1993-94 and 1994-95 <br />fiscal years, the State Legislature enacted legislation which, among other things, reallocated <br />funds from redevelopment agencies to school districts by shifting a portion of each agency's tax <br />increment, net of amounts due to other taxing agencies, to school districts for such fiscal years <br />for deposit in the Education Revenue Augmentation Fund ("ERAF"). The amount required to be <br />paid by a redevelopment agency under such legislation was apportioned among all of its <br />redevelopment project areas on a collective basis, and was not allocated separately to <br />individual project areas. <br />In connection with its approval of the budget for the 2002-03, the State Legislature <br />enacted legislation which reallocated funds from redevelopment agencies to school districts by <br />shifting a portion of each agency's tax increment, net of amounts due to other taxing agencies, to <br />school districts for such fiscal years for deposit in the Education Revenue Augmentation Fund <br />-17- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.