My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
8F Consent 2009 0601
CityHall
>
City Clerk
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2009
>
Packet 2009 0601
>
8F Consent 2009 0601
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/29/2009 9:45:27 AM
Creation date
5/29/2009 9:45:26 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CM City Clerk-City Council
CM City Clerk-City Council - Document Type
Staff Report
Document Date (6)
6/1/2009
Retention
PERM
Document Relationships
_CC Agenda 2009 0601
(Reference)
Path:
\City Clerk\City Council\Agenda Packets\2009\Packet 2009 0601
Reso 2009-074
(Reference)
Path:
\City Clerk\City Council\Resolutions\2009
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
1400 K Street, Suite 400 • Sacramento, California 95814 <br />-~ Phone: 916.658.$200 Fax: 916.658.8240 <br /><~k= CrlLl ~=~~}i~ hJl~, www.cacities.org <br />TO: City Officials <br />FROM: Chris McKenzie, Executive Director <br />RE: Sample Resolution Declaring Severe Fiscal Hardship <br />DATE: Friday, May 08, 2009 <br />Background. On May 5 the Department of Finance announced it had proposed to the <br />Governor that the state "borrow" over $2 billion in local property taxes from cities, <br />counties and special districts to balance the state budget, causing deeper cuts in local <br />public safety and other vital service. In order to start that process, the Governor would <br />have to issue a proclamation declaring the existence of a "severe fiscal hardship." The <br />legislature would then have to implement the "borrowing" program by passing urgency <br />legislation (2/3 vote) which identifies how the "loan" will be repaid with interest. <br />Resolution. The League has developed the attached Resolution Finding A Severe <br />Fiscal Hardship Will Exist if this proposed state property tax raid is added to the <br />pressures of the ongoing property tax losses and the serious revenue losses due to the <br />economic recession. The resolution in effect states that the idea of the state taking <br />property tax funds from already stressed city budgets is ludicrous and irresponsible. It <br />helps demonstrate that part of the reason cities are cutting there budgets today, in fact, is <br />because of past and continuing property tax raids. If possible, we urge that a staff report <br />be prepared with information on property tax losses (see below) and budget cuts the city <br />has made and is facing. <br />Cumulative Property Tax Losses. The attached resolution cites the cumulative property <br />tax losses of cities statewide since the state began taking these funds in the early 1990s- <br />which is $8.6 billion statewide even after deducting payments cities receive from the <br />Prop. 172 public safety sales tax the state COPS grant program. If you want to see your <br />individual city total, see: http://www.californiacityfinance.com/ERAFbyCity08.pdf. <br />Please use the figure in the last column on the right if you want to insert the amount your <br />city has lost to these state raids. <br />Where to Send Copies. The draft resolution directs the city clerk to send copies to your <br />legislators, the Governor, and the League. We would appreciate you faxing copies to both <br />your League Regional Public Affairs Manager and the League's Sacramento Office (Fax <br />916-658-8240). <br />Note. The last WHEREAS clause was included on the advice of bond counsel to avoid <br />any implication that the city would not honor any of its bond or other contractual <br />obligations. <br />Questions. If you have any questions or need any information please contact your <br />League Regional Public Affairs Manager. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.