My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
8A Consent 2009 0601
CityHall
>
City Clerk
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2009
>
Packet 2009 0601
>
8A Consent 2009 0601
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/29/2009 10:55:46 AM
Creation date
5/29/2009 10:55:43 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CM City Clerk-City Council
CM City Clerk-City Council - Document Type
Draft Minutes
Document Date (6)
5/18/2009
Retention
PERM
Document Relationships
_CC Agenda 2009 0601
(Reference)
Path:
\City Clerk\City Council\Agenda Packets\2009\Packet 2009 0601
Minutes 2009 0518
(Superseded by)
Path:
\City Clerk\City Council\Minutes\2009
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
DRAFT MINUTES <br /> Page 2 <br />May 18, 2009 <br />City of San Leandro City Council and San Leandro Redevelopment Agency Joint Meeting <br /> <br /> <br />th <br /> <br />A.Matter of Amendment to the Existing Utility Underground District on East 14 Street <br />th <br />from 150 Avenue to Lillian Avenue to Include the Segment from Lillian Avenue to <br />Thornton Street/Maud Avenue. <br /> <br />This being the time and place for the Public Hearing on the above matter, City Manager <br />Hollister introduced Engineering and Transportation Director Uche Udemezue. Mr. <br />Udemezue provided a brief history and background on utility undergrounding in the <br />City, and introduced Senior Engineer Nick Thom. Mr. Thom gave a short <br />PowerPoint presentation, describing the proposed amendment to the existing Utility <br />Underground District. <br /> <br />Staff responded to questions from the Council. <br /> <br />Councilmember Reed asked about the cost to the property owners of installing the <br />service laterals. Mr. Thom stated that the costs could vary widely, depending on the <br />circumstances; however, a residential or simple commercial property installation <br />would cost approximately $3,000. <br /> <br />Councilmember Starosciak asked if liens could be placed on the properties to fund the <br />cost of installing the service laterals. Mr. Udemezue commented on some of the ways <br />the Council could consider handling the installation costs. <br /> <br />The Hearing was then opened to the public. <br /> <br />James Begier, San Leandro resident, <br /> addressed the City Council, commenting that <br />he supported the concept of the underground utility district. Mr. Begier expressed <br />concern that the cost for installing the service laterals was never disclosed to the <br />affected property owners, and he requested that the approval of this item be delayed <br />for two years in order to provide the property owners with this information. <br /> <br />There being no further comments from the public, and without objection, the Public <br />Hearing was closed. <br /> <br />Mayor Santos commented on the need to underground the utilities in the Doolittle <br />Drive corridor as well. <br /> <br />Councilmember Stephens requested clarification regarding when the property owners <br />would be required to pay the cost of installing the service laterals. Mr. Udemezue <br />stated that when the time comes to connect the property owners to the utilities, staff <br />would recommend to the Council the payment options for the installation costs that <br />could be made available to property owners, such as CDBG grants. <br /> <br /> Resolution No. 2009-065 <br />, Resolution Amending the Existing Utility <br />thth <br />Underground District on East 14 Street from 150 Avenue to Lillian Avenue to <br />Include the Segment from Lillian Avenue to Thornton Street/Maud Avenue <br />(requires the removal of poles, overhead wires and associated overhead structures, <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.