My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
ShorelineMarina Highlights 2009 0526
CityHall
>
City Clerk
>
City Council
>
Committees
>
Shoreline-Marina Committee
>
ShorelineMarina Highlights 2009 0526
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/12/2009 10:00:56 AM
Creation date
6/12/2009 10:00:56 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CM City Clerk-City Council
CM City Clerk-City Council - Document Type
Committee Highlights
Document Date (6)
5/26/2009
Retention
PERM
Document Relationships
_CC Agenda 2009 0615
(Reference)
Path:
\City Clerk\City Council\Agenda Packets\2009\Packet 2009 0615
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
view mirror hanger permits. The daily fee collection systems ranged from aself-register <br />envelope deposit box (Iron Ranger) to automated ticket dispensing machines similar to the <br />parking meters in Oakland and Berkeley (Model 400 or Ventek). The least expensive was the <br />Iron Ranger, $1,265 per box. The Model 400 was $10,325 per unit. Both the Iron Ranger and <br />Model 400 were cash only systems. The Ventek was $21,621 per unit for a cash only machine <br />and $22,004 per unit for a cash and credit card machine. This brand was more expensive due to <br />the electrical connection and wireless Internet connection for credit card transactions. The daily <br />fee would be implemented, to a great extent, on the `honor system' as there would not be a paid <br />attendant to collect the fees. Marina staff would check the boat launch approximately twice a <br />day to verify payment. Marina staff would implement public announcements about the <br />proposed boat launch fee by sending letters to the fishermen's clubs, yacht clubs and marina <br />berthers. They would also post signs at the launch ramp prior to implementation of the new fee. <br />(The Marina Inn management has volunteered to have change on hand for the boaters at the <br />hotel's front counter; this could be included on the signs). The proposed boat launch fee would <br />require amendments to the Administrative Code to create a launch fee. Once the launch fee is <br />implemented, staff will evaluate the need for further code revisions such as restricting boat <br />trailer parking in surrounding parking lots to discourage persons from circumventing the boat <br />launch fee by using the launch and parking elsewhere in the area other than the designated <br />vehicle and trailer parking lot. In addition, the Code may have to be amended to allow citation <br />authority for the Marina Supervisor. This is a common practice in other marinas and allows <br />enforcement without demand on the Police Department services. The proposed fee is a launch <br />fee and not a parking fee. <br />Councilmember Prola shared that he has conducted an informal unscientific survey having <br />talked with boaters and asking them about a proposed launch fee. They have told him that they <br />would be willing to pay the launch fee. They also told him that in their opinion collection of <br />the fee by the honor system would not likely work. Without an attendant to collect the fee and <br />without strict enforcement people will choose not to pay the nominal fee. Of the various <br />collection systems he preferred the Model 400. The proposed fees appeared inexpensive and <br />stated that perhaps the $50 seasonal permit fee should be $100 and the $100 annual permit fee <br />should be $200. <br />Vice-Mayor Starosciak asked if the cost of the Iron Ranger was a onetime cost and if the <br />Model 400 had monthly or annual maintenance costs. Supervisor Snodgrass replied that the <br />Iron Ranger was a onetime cost without any maintenance or utility fees. The Model 400 had a <br />very small monthly utility cost due to having electric hook up to operate it. Councilmember <br />Starosciak stated that a $10/day launch fee seemed reasonable and that the honor system of <br />collecting the fees was a good idea. She recommended that in addition to the letters and signs <br />for the public announcement about the new launch fee, the City should provide a press release <br />for the website and in the newspapers. She appreciated the Marina Inn for volunteering to have <br />change available for the boaters. She supported the idea for a launch fee. <br />Al Fernandez, from the public audience, interjected that the City of Berkeley has experienced <br />problems with the Model 400 when the boaters did not have exact change or currency. He <br />shared that the Iron Ranger at Half Moon Bay has been the best user friendly fee collection <br />system. He recommended that due to the expensive cost of the automated systems the City first <br />start the program with the less expensive Iron Ranger box system. San Leandro has a good <br />launch ramp with a good location in relation to the Bay Area. A $200 annual fee may be too <br />high; $150 annual fee would be a good compromise. <br />Mayor Santos and Councilmember Prola commended Mr. Fernandez on his participation and <br />time and resources he has spent collecting information in the topic of boat launch ramp fees. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.