My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agmt 2009 California State Coastal Conservancy
CityHall
>
City Clerk
>
City Council
>
Agreements
>
2009
>
Agmt 2009 California State Coastal Conservancy
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2009 11:00:09 AM
Creation date
7/17/2009 11:00:09 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CM City Clerk-City Council
CM City Clerk-City Council - Document Type
Agreement
Document Date (6)
7/6/2009
Retention
PERM
Document Relationships
Agmt 2006 State Coastal Conservancy
(Amended)
Path:
\City Clerk\City Council\Agreements\2006
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
INVASIVE SPARTINA PROJECT <br />shown in the staff recommendations attached as Exhibits 1 through 3 of the accompanying <br />staff recommendation. <br />2. The proposed authorization remains consistent with the Project Selection Criteria and <br />Guidelines last updated by the Conservancy on September 20, 2007. <br />The California Wildlife Foundation, Friends of Corte Madera Creek Watershed, and Friends <br />of the Petaluma River are nonprofit organizations existing under Section 501(c)(3) of the <br />United States Internal Revenue Code, whose purposes are consistent with Division 21 of the <br />California Public Resources Code." <br />PROJECT DESCRIPTION: <br />Background and Accomplishments <br />As detailed in previous staff recommendations (Exhibits 1, 2, 3 and 4), treatment and control of <br />invasive Spartina and its hybrids within the San Francisco Bay Estuary are critical to the long- <br />term health of the Estuary and to the species which inhabit and rely upon the salt marshes and <br />tidal flats along its perimeter. Invasive Spartina spreads at a greater than exponential rate, and <br />every tidal marsh restoration project implemented within the south and central San Francisco <br />Bay Estuary in the past 16 years has been invaded by non-native invasive Spartina. Invasive <br />Spartina also threatens to spread out the Golden Gate and north and south along the California <br />coastline. <br />For the past nine years the Conservancy has managed the regionally coordinated effort to bring <br />the infestation under control and is now moving towards eradication. The Conservancy advanced <br />the project through, among other actions, 1) in 2003 adoption of the "Programmatic <br />Environmental Impact Statement/Environmental Impact Report, San Francisco Estuary Invasive <br />Spartina Project: Spartina Control Program" (FEIS/R), 2) in 2004 implementation of treatment <br />at 12 demonstration sites, and 3) from 2005 through 2008 implementation of region-wide <br />aggressive treatment, monitoring, and adaptive management at 24 sites (covering 156 sub-sites) <br />utilizing a mix of control methods at all known infested sites. <br />The Conservancy's Invasive Spartina Project (ISP) established control over the invasive <br />Spartina populations Bay-wide in 2006 by realizing a significant overall reduction in acreage as <br />well as halting seed production and dispersal over the majority of the Estuary. The 2007 and <br />2008 treatment shifted towards commencing control work earlier in the season when efficacy <br />tends to be higher. Applying adaptive management to refine timing, coordination and <br />methodologies, ISP continues to advance towards its goal of eradication. Currently 90% of the <br />infestation has been removed from the Estuary. <br />In 2008, ISP management of the Control Program completed the first three-year update of 24 <br />treatment plans covering 156 sub-areas, including one new site plan (North San Pablo Bay), and <br />submitting these documents to the US Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) for an amended <br />Biological Opinion. FWS authorized treatment and approved an even longer treatment season. <br />FWS was able to approve earlier access to some California clapper rail inhabited sites. Over the <br />past four years the annual inventory surveys of the endangered rails have shown an increase in <br />the number of rails at treated sites rather than the decrease that was expected. (To better <br />understand the impact of treatment on clapper rails, ISP also conducts a telemetry study to <br />Page 3 of 8 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.