My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Reso 2004-069
CityHall
>
City Clerk
>
City Council
>
Resolutions
>
2004
>
Reso 2004-069
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/10/2009 10:16:16 AM
Creation date
8/10/2009 10:16:13 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CM City Clerk-City Council
CM City Clerk-City Council - Document Type
Resolution
Document Date (6)
5/3/2004
Retention
PERM
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
58
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
That the City Council, based on review of the Mitigated Negative Declaration and Initial <br />Study and all other elements comprising the record as a whole, finds: <br />a. The project consists o£ transporting approximately 90,000 cubic yard of dried <br />sediment by truck for reuse at the Oyster Bay Regional Park and restoration of the <br />DMMS; <br />b. The project will not have an adverse effect on wildlife resources, as defined in <br />Section 711.4 of the Fish and Game Code; <br />c. An initial study has been conducted to evaluate potential adverse environmental <br />impacts; <br />d. A proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration containing project features and <br />mitigations to avoid or mitigate any potentially significant effects and reflecting <br />the City's independent judgment was circulated for public review; <br />e. The City Council finds and determines that, when considering the record as a <br />whole, there is no evidence before the City that the proposed project will have <br />potential for an adverse environmental effect on the surrounding community or on <br />wildlife resources or the habitat on which wildlife depends; <br />£ The City Council, based on the substantial evidence incorporated in the initial <br />study negative declaration, prof ect plans and specifications, rebuts the <br />presumption of adverse effect provided in Section 753.5(d) of Title 14, California <br />code of Regulations. <br />g. A mitigation and monitoring program has been prepared in compliance with <br />Public Resources Code Section 21081.6. <br />RESOLUTION NO. 2004-069 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.