Reso 2004-082 - Laserfiche WebLink

Metadata

Thumbnails

Annotations

POTENTIALLY ISSUES POTENTIALLY SIGNIFICANT LESS THAN NO SIGNIFICANT UNLESS SIGNIFICANT IP71'ACT SOURCES ISSUES 1171TICAT]ON IMPACT INCORPORATED 1. LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the ro'ect: a. Ph sicall divide an established communi ? X 1 b. Conflict with any applicable land use plan, X 2 policy, or regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not linuted to the general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? c. Conflict with any applicable habitat X 1 conservation plan or natural conununity conservation lan? EXPLANATION: The project site is designated Neighborhood Commercial and High Density Residential in the General Plan. Approval of the project would include a General Plan Map Amendment for the t<vo parcels designated High Density Residential to Neighborhood Conunercial. The Neighborhood Commercial land use designation includes a mix of neighborhood-oriented conunercial uses along major arterials (i.e., Davis Stre.et). The applicant also includes a rezone fi~orn CN to CN(PD) for the two westenunost parcels, and a rezone from RM-1800 High Density Residential to CN(PD) for the two easternmost parcels. The CN Conunercial Neighborhood zoning designation is compatible with the Neighborhood Commercial land use designation and would facilitate the proposed development. The Plamred Development Overlay designation is necessary because some of the development standards (such as parking) cannot be met due to the site's small size. The sun'ounding vicinity is an urban environment, with residential, commercial, and professional uses nearby. ~~rith approval of the rezone and General Plan Map Amendment, no impacts related to land use plans are anticipated. There are no habitat conservation plans in place in either the General Plan or Zoning Code. The project site is not located adjacent to a natural resource. No impacts to habitat/corrservation plans are anticipated, as no plans with the City exist. 2. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would fhe ro"ect: a. Induce substantial population growth in an area X 2 either directly (e.g., by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (e.g. through projects in an undeveloped area or major nifrashucture)? b. Displace substantial number of existing X 2 housing, necessitating the construction of re lacement housin elsewhere? c. Displace substantial numbers of people, X 2 necessitating the construction of replacement housiu elsewhere? EXPLANATION: The project site and area are already served by existing utility systems and public services. There is no existing housing ousite, therefore development of the site would not result in a displacement of housing units or people. The iwo proposed office buildings are sufficiently small that they can be absorbed by the existing demand for professional space without triggering population growth. One building is anticipated to be owner-occupied, as the developer will move its company from elsewhere in San Leandro. The other buildin is antici ated to house two small rofessional offices with a roximately five staff each. 3. GEOLOGY AND SOILS. Would the ro'ect: a. Expose people or structures to potential X 1, 2 substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, in' ~, or death involvin i) Rupture of a larown earthquake fault, as X 1, 2, 4 delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? ii) Stron seisnuc ground shaking? X 1, 2 iii) Seisnuc-related ground failure, including X 1, 2 liquefaction? 1016-1052 Davis/ PLN2004-00031 -Initial Study Checklist 3 Apri12004