My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Reso 2003-171
CityHall
>
City Clerk
>
City Council
>
Resolutions
>
2003
>
Reso 2003-171
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/18/2009 9:56:20 AM
Creation date
8/18/2009 9:56:19 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CM City Clerk-City Council
CM City Clerk-City Council - Document Type
Resolution
Document Date (6)
7/21/2003
Retention
PERM
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
c. Whether the property sought to be acquired is necessary for the Project; and <br />d. Whether the offer required by Government Code Section 7267.2 has been made to <br />the owner(s) of record. <br />NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS FOUND, DETERMINED, AND ORDERED as follows: <br />1. The public interest and necessity require the Project to widen the roadway; <br />2. The project is planned and located in the manner which will be most compatible <br />with the greatest public good and the least private injury; <br />The taking of the fee simple title in and to the real property more particular <br />described in said Exhibit "A" is necessary for the Project; <br />4. The offer required by Section 7267.2 of the Government Code of the State of <br />California has been made to the owner or owners of record of the real property; <br />The law firm of Meyers, Nave, Riback, Silver & Wilson is hereby authorized and <br />directed to institute and conduct to conclusion an action in eminent domain for the <br />acquisition of the estates and interests aforesaid and to take such action as it may <br />deem advisable or necessary in connection therewith; and <br />6. An order for prejudgment possession maybe obtained in said action and a warrant <br />issued to the State Treasury Condemnation Fund, in the amount determined by the <br />Court to be so deposited, as a condition to the right of immediate possession. <br />Introduced by City Council Member G 1 a z e and passed and adopted <br />this 21st day of July 2003, by the following vote: <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.