Laserfiche WebLink
and operational feasibility, feasibility within a 2002/03 timeframe, overlap with <br />other services, political. acceptability, service quality, sustainability and quality <br />control. We will present conceptual options but will not go into operational detail <br />for a community bus route. Operational detail, such as schedules and actual route <br />testing, would be tasks outlined for the implementation phase and developed with <br />planning involvement by the actual target market. <br />B. Presentation of analysis results <br />Results of the comparative analysis along with a recommended strategy would be <br />presented to City staff and Advisory Committee for input. <br />C. Deliverable <br />Based on input from Task 8B, roles and responsibilities would be developed for <br />the recommended strategy. <br />9. Implementation Strategy and Budget <br />Lead: Langille ($2,715) <br />A detailed implementation strategy and time line would be developed for the <br />recommended/preferred service delivery option. The implementation strategy <br />would be accompanied by a two-year budget to carry out the recommendations. <br />10. Present Report and Master Plan <br />Lead: Murray ($5,100) <br />A. Deliver draft Master Plan, which would include the results of Tasks 6-9 far staff <br />and Advisory Committee review. Master Plan would follow format required by <br />ACTIA. One bound and one unbound copy and one disk in Word will be <br />delivered. <br />B. Revise Master Plan based on staff and Advisory Committee comments and submit <br />final document. <br />C. Present fmal Master Plan in a PowerPoint briefing to City Council <br />Labor cost for Phase II $18,135 <br />Estimated direct costs 500 <br />(mileage, printing, phones, <br />fax, mailing, supplies, PowerPoint) <br />TOTAL COST FOR PHASE II $18,635 <br />TOTAL COST FOR PHASES I AND II $32,727 <br />GaQliver\Parahansit\Paratransit Scope I~Ielson Nygaard <br />4 0#' 4 <br />