My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Reso 2002-064
CityHall
>
City Clerk
>
City Council
>
Resolutions
>
2002
>
Reso 2002-064
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/23/2009 10:29:59 AM
Creation date
8/21/2009 2:55:08 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CM City Clerk-City Council
CM City Clerk-City Council - Document Type
Resolution
Document Date (6)
5/6/2002
Retention
PERM
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
50
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
San Leandro General Plan Update <br />Mitigation Monitoring Program <br />Adopted May 6, 2002 <br />' 12er>pprl~ible Mon~tonrl <br />linpa~€! IUIi#tgafi~on fNe~sure~ Vertfiecl, <br />Par#y $~ ~"ifl~irlg ! Respvnsib~l~ty <br />H. Community Services <br />H3: Development consistent with the H.3: Work with the San Leandro and San Lorenzo City Council's City Manager's <br />General Plan would increase the number Unified School Dishicts to consider the following School District Office <br />of students served by the San Leandro strategies to reduce school overcrowding: (1) Liason Committeee <br />Unified School District, impacting changes to school service area boundaries to & City Staff This is <br />several schools that are already at or reflect changes in enrollment on a sub-area level; an ongoing effort. <br />over capacity. State-mandated (2) changes to the academic year to make the most <br />development fees may not fully address efficient use of school facilities; (3) addition of ! <br />this issue. portable classrooms to school campuses; (4) <br />( busing of students to less crowded schools within <br />j the City, or the development of agreements with <br /> the San Lorenzo USD to accept a limited number { <br /> of San Leandro USD students; (5) development of 1 <br /> new facilities, possibly including the acquisition of <br /> undenrtilized sites adjacent to existing school <br /> properties for campus expansion; (6) developer fee <br /> justification studies which establish the need to <br /> charge fees in excess of the maximum school <br /> mitigation fees permitted by state law; and (7) <br /> development of additional charter schools. <br />1 <br />H6: The additional population and H6: Explore additional revenue sources to fund Ci Mana er's~ <br />tY g Finance De t. Fee <br />P ( <br />employment growth accommodated by park improvements, including a park impact fee Office/Finance Dept. study) <br />the General Plan would increase demand requirement for commercial and industrial uses. 4 Draft Fee study <br />for parks and recreational services, and being prepared. 1 <br />could cause the City #o fall further short <br />of its acreage-based park service <br />standard. Demand could be particularly <br />acute for facilities serving the increased <br />number of local employees. <br />i <br />page 3 of 4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.