Laserfiche WebLink
Shoreline CAC <br />September 16, 2009 <br />Meeting Highlights <br />Page ~4 <br />• What was the proposed linear footage (length) of the boat slips shown on the <br />plans? They are shown conceptually on the proposed plans. They will likely be <br />what the market dictates and what the dredged area can physically <br />accommodate. <br />• Are the proposed multi-story office buildings and hotel conference center subject <br />to Bay Conservation Development Commission (BCDC) review, including <br />shadow and solar access analysis? Are multi-story buildings possible in the <br />development team's opinion? The proposed plans were for discussion and study <br />by the CAC, only. The multi-story buildings were meant to be low profile and not <br />taller than three-stories. These low profile buildings are possible to develop. <br />• The pedestrian bridge in Discussion Plan 2 brings the proposed development <br />and uses together which otherwise would be separated from one another by a <br />large body of water. <br />• The appropriate new hotel size for the shoreline area is approximately 175 to 225 <br />rooms. This additional hotel would need new office development to support it. <br />Analysis has shown that a 250 to 300 room hotel would not be viable. <br />• The hotel conference center in the central location in Plan 2 is preferred since it <br />would have plenty of interesting views from every side of the proposed building. <br />• Would the two lagoons on Plan 2 be used for any activity? They are intended to <br />be passive. The one lagoon adjacent to the hotel would have a sand beach for <br />sunning, volleyball or weddings. <br />• Small row boats or paddle boats were recommended as an activity for the <br />lagoons. <br />• The proposed multi-family residential would require amendments to the General <br />Plan, its Land Use element, and Zoning Code to consider housing in the plan. <br />• Housing and offices are good uses to have near each other since residents are <br />present in the evenings to deter vandalism and theft. Residents and their visitors <br />can use the parking for the offices when they are closed in the evenings and <br />weekends. <br />• Residential development at the Marina Boulevard entry to the shoreline would be <br />an upgrade to the existing entry which is largely an unused expansive asphalt <br />parking lot. <br />• What is the basis for the office buildings? An office campus needs 200,000 to <br />300,000 square feet to attract a good company and to create a campus <br />environment (perhaps acomputer/high-tech company). The proposed sizes in <br />Plans 2 and 3 make it attractive and more likely to recruit a potential company. <br />• Plan 1 has the least amount of risk in investment and development. However <br />there is nothing special about the plan -it's not an exciting plan. It would not have <br />a Class A tenant. This plan also lacked continuity. <br />• Manager Battenberg interjected that Clifbar Corporation outgrew its previous <br />location and wanted to relocate a few years ago, and ended up in Alameda <br />because the City could not offer a large enough office setting with amenities for <br />its relocation. The shoreline was the type of environment Clifbar was looking for. <br />