My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2A Work Session 2009 1109
CityHall
>
City Clerk
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2009
>
Packet 2009 1109
>
2A Work Session 2009 1109
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/6/2009 3:02:25 PM
Creation date
11/6/2009 3:02:19 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CM City Clerk-City Council
CM City Clerk-City Council - Document Type
Staff Report
Document Date (6)
11/9/2009
Retention
PERM
Document Relationships
_CC Agenda 2009 1109
(Reference)
Path:
\City Clerk\City Council\Agenda Packets\2009\Packet 2009 1109
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
92
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
November 9, 2009 Section 6: Municipal Operations <br />Traffic Signals and Streetlights <br />In 2002, 750 traffic signal lights were converted to more energy efficient LED (light-emitting <br />diodes) bulbs starting with the green and red traffic lights. Since then, all traffic signals have <br />been converted to LED technology, from the older incandescent lamps. Traffic signals that use <br />LEDs consume 80-90 percent less energy and generally last 5-7 years, compared to just a year <br />for a comparable incandescent light signal. LED traffic signals also offer significant peak <br />demand savings since they operate 24 hours a day.21 <br />Given the success of the LED traffic signals, the City is now looking to replace streetlights with <br />more efficient fixture types. Switching to energy efficient streetlights will save taxpayer money <br />and greenhouse gases. Most street lights are high pressure sodium (HPS) lamps. The <br />streetlight retrofit would require replacing the entire head of each street light, to replace the HPS <br />lamp and ballast. Retrofitting the street lights are expected to result to reduced electricity <br />consumption by up to 40 percent. <br />Water and Sewage Facilities <br />The Water Pollution Control Plant (WPCP) is generally the largest single energy user of all City <br />facilities. A project to install a cogeneration unit is already underway. The cogeneration unit will <br />run off the methane gas produced in the digesters. The cogeneration will produce electricity to <br />operate the plant and heat to run the plant's anaerobic digester. <br />Reduce, then Produce <br />Following the City's initial efforts to reduce energy use, The City is considering assessing the <br />feasibility of a solar installation site at the Water Pollution Control Plant. Given the economic <br />and environmental benefits of improving the energy efficiency of municipal buildings, the City <br />will prioritize efficiency improvements prior to the more expensive solar PV installations. Power <br />purchase agreements (PPAs) may also be an approach to installing solar systems. A PPA <br />involves leasing the photovoltaic equipment and paying for the energy on a monthly basis. <br />Third-party PPAs are generally feasible for large (>500 kW) PV systems, but not for small <br />systems (<100 kW) as the administrative and financing costs often outweigh the potential tax <br />benefits. The City is waiting for energy efficiency upgrades to be completed on City Hall before <br />evaluating potential photovoltaic systems for that building. <br />Measures and actions for consideration: <br />21 Consortium for Energy Efficiency. httpa/www.cee1.org/gov/led/led-main.php3 <br />~~~ sari r~9'~o Page 45 <br />c <br />SC1YFj`{,' <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.