Laserfiche WebLink
Preface <br />This document is current through Ordinance 20-06, passed May 16, 2006. Please consult OrdLink for <br />more recent ordinances. <br />Copyright 2003 Matthew Bender & Company, Inc., a member of the LexisNexis Group. <br />All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or distributed in any form or by any <br />means, or stored in a database or retrieval system, without the prior written permission of the publisher. <br />Published by: <br />LexisNexis <br />13427 NE 16th Street <br />Suite 150 <br />Bellevue WA 98005 <br />1-866-501-5155 <br />v/ww.lexisnexis.com/municipalcodes <br />_~:. <br />~+,~tlni~i~a1 ~e~~~e~ <br />2.60.0'10 Title and purpose. <br />This Chapter shall be known and may be cited as the "City of Richmond Living Wage <br />Ordinance." The purpose of this Chapter is to protect the public health, safety and welfare. <br />It does this by requiring that employees of City contractors, lessees, recipients of City <br />financial aid and their respective subcontractors expend public funds in such a manner as <br />to facilitate individual self-reliance. <br />2.60.020 Findings. <br />The City Council of the City of Richmond finds as follows: <br />(a) The City of Richmond awards many contracts to private firms to provide services to the <br />public and to City Government; and <br />(b) The City of Richmond provides financial assistance and funding to others for the <br />purpose of economic development or job growth; and <br />(c) The city of Richmond has a limited amount of taxpayer resources to expend; and <br />(d) Even in promising economic times, far too many people working in Richmond and their <br />families live below or near the poverty line; and <br />(e) The use of taxpayer dollars to promote sustenance and creation of living wage jobs will <br />increase consumer income, decrease levels of poverty, invigorate neighborhood <br />businesses and reduce the need for taxpayer-funded social programs in other areas; and <br />(f) When inadequate compensation is paid to service employees within the City, it fails to <br />provide service employees with resources sufficient to afford life. It is critical that when City <br />funds are used to contract for services, such contracts demonstrate an effort to promote an <br />employment environment that enhances the general quality of life within the community <br />and maximizes the productive effect of the City's limited resources; and <br />(g) Financial assistance recipients of the City are engaged in hospitality or some other line <br />