My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Finance Highlights 2006 1206
CityHall
>
City Clerk
>
City Council
>
Committees
>
Finance Committee
>
Finance Highlights 2006 1206
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/19/2009 1:27:47 PM
Creation date
11/19/2009 1:27:45 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CM City Clerk-City Council
CM City Clerk-City Council - Document Type
Committee Highlights
Document Date (6)
12/6/2006
Retention
PERM
Document Relationships
_CC Agenda 2006 1218
(Reference)
Path:
\City Clerk\City Council\Agenda Packets\2006\Packet 2006 1218
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
56
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
BERKELEY /Wage law survives high court Page 1 of 2 <br />~~'j~~,opm ww~v.sfgate.com Return <br />to regular view <br />BERKELEY <br />Wage law survives high court <br />- Bob Eoelko. Chronicle Staff Writer <br />Tuesday, January 11, 2005 <br />Berkeley's "living wage" law was bolstered Monday when the U.S. Supreme Court denied a <br />hearing to a restaurant that challenged the extension of the ordinance to businesses on the <br />city marina. <br />The extension, passed in 2000, affected only employees of a single business -- Skates on the <br />Bay, a waterfront restaurant --because other marina employers had signed union contracts, <br />making them exempt from the law. Skates' owner argued that because it was nonunion, it <br />had been targeted by the city in violation of federal labor law and the constitutional <br />guarantee of equal protection. <br />The U.S. Court of Appeals in San Francisco disagreed in June, ruling 2-1 that the city was <br />entitled to extend the ordinance to a particular area to ensure decent living standards for <br />workers. The high court denied review Monday without comment. <br />"This makes it clear that the government has wide latitude in enacting this kind of social <br />welfare legislation," City Attorney Manuela Albuquerque said. <br />She said that Berkeley had invested $130 million in the marina and that "workers should be <br />entitled to get some benefit out of that investment." <br />An attorney for Skates' owner, RUI One Corp. of Seattle, was unavailable for comment. But <br />attorney D. Gregory Valenta, who filed arguments supporting RUI on behalf of business <br />organizations, said the appeals court ruling might allow local governments to single out any <br />controversial business -- a big- box retailer, gun club or abortion clinic -- for unfavorable <br />treatment. <br />"Stretched to its conclusion, this decision could result in quite a bit of mischief," said <br />Valenta, whose clients included the national and state restaurant associations and the U.S. <br />Chamber of Commerce. <br />In his Supreme Court filing, he argued that Berkeley was "altering the delicate balance of <br />power between employers and unions." <br />Living wage ordinances are in effect in more than 100 cities nationwide, include San <br />Francisco, San Jose, Oakland, Hayward and Richmond, and have survived other legal <br />challenges. Berkeley's ordinance entitles employees to $9. 75 an hour, or $11.37 if health <br />benefits are not provided. California's minimum wage is $6.75. <br />The wage increase required by the ordinance has been held in escrow since 2000 and will <br />now be paid to the restaurant's employees, Albuquerque said. <br />The amendment extending the ordinance to the marina was drafted to apply only to <br />businesses with at least six employees and gross sales of $350,000 a year. The extension <br />httn~l/www_~f~ate.cam/cQi-hin/article_c~i?file=/chrcnic1e/archive/2005/O1 /11 BAGNFAO6... 1/12/2005 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.