My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agmt 2009 Alameda County (2)
CityHall
>
City Clerk
>
City Council
>
Agreements
>
2009
>
Agmt 2009 Alameda County (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/8/2009 4:39:45 PM
Creation date
12/8/2009 4:39:06 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CM City Clerk-City Council
CM City Clerk-City Council - Document Type
Agreement
Document Date (6)
12/1/2009
Retention
PERM
Document Relationships
_CC Agenda 2009 1207
(Reference)
Path:
\City Clerk\City Council\Agenda Packets\2009\Packet 2009 1207
Reso 2009-158
(Approved by)
Path:
\City Clerk\City Council\Resolutions\2009
Reso 2009-158
(Reference)
Path:
\City Clerk\City Council\Resolutions\2009
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
55
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
of the reports required by Section 3.5. In accordance with NSP2 Requirements, <br />substantially all Program Income must be disbursed for eligible NSP2 Activities before <br />the County may expend additional NSP2 funds. <br />ARTICLE 3. <br />PERFORMANCE OF NSP2 ACTIVITIES <br />Section 3.1 Performance of NSP2 Activities. <br />The County shall perform and cooperatively carry out all NSP2 Activities <br />described in the Grant Application in a timely manner and in compliance with the NSP2 <br />Requirements. The County shall carry out the NSP2 Activities described in the Grant <br />Application within the Consortium jurisdiction. <br />Section 3.2 Lead Member Administrative Responsibilities. <br />The County, as Lead Member, has the duties set forth in the Consortium <br />Agreement. In addition, the Lead Member is responsible for (i) entering into the Grant <br />Agreement, (ii) using best efforts to ensure that the NSP2 Program is effected in <br />compliance with all NSP2 requirements, (iii) providing support and guidance to all <br />Members in carrying out NSP2 Activities, and (iv) submitting documents to HUD as <br />required for participation in the NSP2 Program, including but not limited to all DRGR <br />System reporting. <br />The City, as a Member of the Consortium, will participate in the Steering <br />Committee, and provide one city staff person to participate in these quarterly meetings. <br />Section 3.3 Selection of Developers. <br />The County shall participate in a cooperative effort with other Members to <br />prepare and distribute a Local Request for Proposals (RFP) to request proposals from <br />potential Developers. As previously decided by the Steering Committee during its first <br />meeting in June 2009, those Members whom have conducted previous competitive <br />processes for NSP may submit their selected Developer as an approved developer under <br />the NSP2 program To date, Alameda County has conducted a competitive process on <br />behalf of the Urban County; the City of Livermore has conducted a competitive process <br />on behalf of a group of cities funded by the State under the State NSP 1 program; and the <br />City of Hayward has conducted a competitive process under the State NSP 1 program. <br />The Steering Committee shall make a final decision regarding the number of Developers <br />to use in this program. Once Developers have been selected, the County will separately <br />contract with one or more such Developers to implement NSP2 Activities through-out the <br />Consortium. Selected Developers shall implement the Consortium-Wide NSP program <br />in accordance with the approved NSP Program Agreement, attached and made reference <br />to this Agreement as Exhibit D. <br />Section 3.4 Model NSP2 Documents. <br />Alameda County and City of San Leandro 7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.