Laserfiche WebLink
SB 1045. In 2003, the State legislature adopted Senate Bill 1045 ("SB 1045"), which <br />provided that the governing body could adopt an ordinance to extend the limits on the <br />effectiveness of redevelopment plans and the authority to collect Tax Increment Revenues by <br />one additional year if the Agency was required to make a payment to the Educational Revenue <br />Augmentation Fund ("ERAF") in 2003-04, By Ordinance No. 2003-018, adopted December 15, <br />2003 the City Council amended the Redevelopment Plans of the Project Areas to implement <br />the one-year extension. <br />SB 1096. In 2004, the State legislature .adopted Senate Bill 1096 "(SB 1096"), which <br />provided that the governing body could, with respect to redevelopment plans with less than 20 <br />years remaining, adopt an ordinance to extend the limits on the effectiveness of redevelopment <br />plans and the authority to collect Tax Increment Revenues by one additional year for each <br />ERAF payment if the Agency was required to make a payment to ERAF in 2004/05 and <br />2005/06. Because the remaining Redevelopment Plan effectiveness for the Project Areas are <br />greater than twenty years the Redevelopment Plan time limits may not be further extended <br />under SB1096. <br />AB x4_26. In July 2009, the State legislature adopted Assembly Bill x4_26 ("AB 26"), <br />which provided that the governing body could adopt an ordinance to extend the limits on the <br />effectiveness of redevelopment plans and the authority to collect Tax Increment Revenues by <br />one additional year if the Agency makes a payment to the Supplemental Educational Revenue <br />Augmentation Fund ("SERAF") in 2009-10. The Agency expects that, if the validity of AB 26 is <br />judicially upheld, the Agency will make the required payments and amend the Redevelopment <br />Plans for the Project Areas to implement the one year extension. The SERAF payment is <br />described in detail under the caption "RISK FACTORS -State of California Fiscal Issues." <br />Agency Agreements. The Agency has one agreement for housing-related projects <br />funded from the Housing Set-Aside and which are senior to the 2010 Bonds. This agreement is <br />a Section 108 loan contract with the United States Department of Housing and Urban <br />Development ("HUD") for the Cherrywood single-family development and the ABHOW senior <br />rental project; the contract requires the Agency's housing fund to maintain a minimum balance <br />of $250,000 until 2019-20 as security for the loan and to make annual payments of up to <br />$87,104 until August 1, 2019. <br />Agency Tax Sharing Obligations -Joint Project Area <br />A61290 Tax Sharing. As a project area formed prior to January 1, 1994, the Joint <br />Project Area is not subject to the statutory pass-through payments required for project areas <br />formed after that date. <br />Tax Sharing Agreements. The Joint Project Area is subject to several fiscal <br />agreements that were negotiated with taxing entities during the plan adoption process. These <br />agreements are briefly summarized following. <br />County Fiscal Agreements. The Agency is subject to fiscal agreements with several <br />taxing entities in the Joint Project Area that are paid through the redevelopment fund and do not <br />affect the Low and Moderate Income Housing Fund. <br />AC Transit Fiscal Agreement. The fiscal agreement with the AC Transit District requires <br />the Agency to pay to the District the District's proportionate share of tax increment from a base <br />-23- <br />