My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
10B Action 2009 1221
CityHall
>
City Clerk
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2009
>
Packet 2009 1221
>
10B Action 2009 1221
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/17/2009 10:13:45 AM
Creation date
12/17/2009 10:13:36 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CM City Clerk-City Council
CM City Clerk-City Council - Document Type
Staff Report
Document Date (6)
12/21/2009
Retention
PERM
Document Relationships
_CC Agenda 2009 1221
(Reference)
Path:
\City Clerk\City Council\Agenda Packets\2009\Packet 2009 1221
RDA Reso 2009-024
(Reference)
Path:
\City Clerk\City Council\Resolutions\2009
Reso 2009-170
(Reference)
Path:
\City Clerk\City Council\Resolutions\2009
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
175
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Effective September 30, 1980, the California Legislature added Section 33678 to the <br />Redevelopment Law which provided that the allocation of taxes to a redevelopment agency for <br />the purpose of paying principal of, or interest on, loans, advances, or indebtedness shall not be <br />deemed the receipt by such agency of proceeds of taxes levied by or on behalf of the agency <br />within the meaning of Article XIIIB, nor shall such portion of taxes be deemed receipt of <br />proceeds of taxes by, or an appropriation subject to the limitation of, any other public body <br />within the meaning or for the purpose of the Constitution and laws of the State of California, <br />including Section 33678 of the Redevelopment Law. The constitutionality of Section 33678 has <br />been upheld in two California appellate court decisions, Brown v. Community Redevelopment <br />Agency of the City of Santa Ana and Bell Community Redevelopment Agency v. Woosley. The <br />plaintiff in Brown v. Community Redevelopment Agency of the City of Santa Ana petitioned the <br />California Supreme Court for a hearing of this case. The California Supreme Court formally <br />denied the petition and therefore the earlier court decisions are now final and binding. On the <br />basis of these court decisions, the Agency has not adopted an appropriations limit. <br />CONTINUING DISCLOSURE <br />The Agency has covenanted for the benefit of holders and beneficial owners of the 2010 <br />Bonds to provide certain financial information and operating data relating to the Agency by not <br />later than nine (9) months following the end of the Agency's fiscal year (which currently would <br />be by March 31 each year based upon the June 30 end of the Agency's fiscal year), <br />commencing March 31, 2010, with the report for the 2008-09 Fiscal Year (the "Annual <br />Report"), and to provide notices of the occurrence of certain enumerated events, if material. <br />The Annual Report will be filed by the Agency with each Nationally Recognized Municipal <br />Securities Information Repository, and with the appropriate State information depository, if any. <br />The notices of material events will be filed by the Agency with the Municipal Securities <br />Rulemaking Board (and with the appropriate State information depository, if any). The specific <br />nature of the information to be contained in the Annual Report or the notices of material events <br />is set forth in "APPENDIX F -Form of Continuing Disclosure Certificate." These covenants <br />have been made in order to assist the Underwriter in complying with S.E.C. Rule 15c2-12(b)(5). <br />The Agency has not failed to meet its obligation to provide annual reports or notices of material <br />events in any previous undertakings pursuant to the Rule. <br />NO LITIGATION <br />There is no litigation pending or, to the Agency's knowledge, threatened in any way to <br />restrain or enjoin the issuance, execution or delivery of the 2010 Bonds, to contest the validity <br />of the 2010 Bonds, the Indenture or any proceedings of the Agency with respect thereto. In the <br />opinion of the Agency and its counsel, there are no lawsuits or claims pending against the <br />Agency which will materially affect the Agency's finances so as to impair the ability to pay <br />principal of and interest on the 2010 Bonds when due. <br />-53- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.