My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
10C Action 2010 0119
CityHall
>
City Clerk
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2010
>
Packet 2010 0119
>
10C Action 2010 0119
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/14/2010 4:48:18 PM
Creation date
1/14/2010 4:48:17 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CM City Clerk-City Council
CM City Clerk-City Council - Document Type
Staff Report
Document Date (6)
1/19/2010
Retention
PERM
Document Relationships
_CC Agenda 2010 0119
(Reference)
Path:
\City Clerk\City Council\Agenda Packets\2010\Packet 2010 0119
MO 2010-010
(Reference)
Path:
\City Clerk\City Council\Minute Orders\2010
Reso 2010-006
(Reference)
Path:
\City Clerk\City Council\Resolutions\2010
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
27
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
To: Marian Handa <br />From: Jayne Williams, City Attorney <br />Richard D. Pio Roda, Assistant City Attorney <br />Re: City Attorney Opinion -Instant Run-Off Voting Procedure <br />Date: January 11, 2010 <br />Page: 2 <br />Legitimacy of an Instant Run-Off Votinq System to Determine the Fifty Percent (50%) plus one City <br />Charter Requirement <br />The City proposes a ranked choice voting method for the instant run-off voting system. Voters will be given <br />a list of candidates, and must rank the candidates according to each voter's first, second and third choice <br />for each such office. Each ranked choice vote would be counted as a vote cast for that office should <br />successive rounds of vote counting be necessary. Thus, ranking a candidate more than once does not <br />benefit a candidate. If a voter ranks one candidate as the voter's first, second and third choice, it is the <br />same as if the voter leaves the second and third choices blank. In addition, if a voter gives more than one <br />candidate the same ranking, the vote cannot be counted (such an outcome is also called an "overvote"). <br />Only one candidate can represent a voter's first, second, and third choice. Therefore, it is possible that <br />under a rank choice voting system the number of votes that the winning candidate receives may be less <br />than a majority of the number of actual voters who participated in the election. Such a result is consistent <br />with and does not conflict with the City Charter because under a rank choice voting system, the winning <br />candidate who receives a majority of "votes cast" for that office in a particular round (1, 2 or 3) will have <br />received fifty percent (50%) plus one of the continuing ballots that contained the votes cast for that office. <br />Rank Choice Votinq Methodology <br />Under a rank choice voting system the votes cast will be counted as follows: <br />1. To start, every first choice vote is counted. Any candidate who receives 50% plus one of the first <br />choice votes is declared the winner. <br />2. If no candidate receives more than 50% plus one of first choice votes, a process of eliminating <br />candidates and transferring votes begins.: <br />• First, the candidate who received the fewest number of first choice votes is eliminated from <br />the race. <br />• Second, voters who selected the eliminated candidate as their first choice will have their <br />vote transferred to their second choice. <br />• Third, all the votes are recounted. <br />3. Once the votes are recounted, if any candidate has received more than 50% plus one of the votes cast, <br />he or she is declared the winner. <br />4. If no candidate receives more than 50% plus one of the votes cast, the process of eliminating <br />candidates and transferring votes is repeated until one candidate obtains the requisite 50% plus one of the <br />votes cast for that office. <br />Conclusion <br />The proposed rank choice voting process establishes that a winning candidate must obtain 50% plus one of <br />the votes cast for that office in order to be elected. Ballots would be recounted as votes cast in the event <br />successive rounds are necessary to determine which candidate garnered the majority of the votes cast. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.