Laserfiche WebLink
Potentially <br /> Significant <br /> Potentially Unless Less than <br /> Significant Mitigation Significant <br /> Impact Mcorporated /mpacf No Impact <br />a. Cause an increase in traffic that is substantial in relation to the existing ~ ~ ~ Q <br />traffic load and capacity of the street system (i.e., result in a substantial <br />increase in either the number of vehicle trips, the volume to capacity ratio <br />on roads, or congestion at intersections)? <br />Comment: The proposed discount superstore ordinances will not result in <br />any new construction or physical improvements that could result in an <br />increase in traffic that is substantial in relation to the existing traffic load <br />and capacity of the street system. The proposed ordinance does disallow <br />large commercial discount superstores that often generate regional traffic <br />demand and consequently diminish local air quality standards due to the <br />increase in vehicle miles traveled. The water conservation ordinance will <br />have no impact on traffic. <br />b. Exceed, either individually or cumulatively, a level of service standard ~ ~ ~ Q <br />established in the Growth Limitation Plan, the county congestion <br />management agency for designated roads or highways? <br />Comment: The proposed discount superstore ordinances will not result in <br />any new construction or physical improvements that could result in any <br />traffic impacts.. The proposed ordinances does disallow large commercial <br />discount superstores that often generate regional traffic demand and <br />consequently diminish local air quality standards due to the increase in <br />vehicle miles traveled.. The water conservation ordinance will have no <br />impact on traffic. <br />c. Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either an increase in ~ ~ ~ ~' <br />traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety risks? <br />(n/a) <br />Comment: The proposed ordinances will not result in any new <br />construction or physical improvements that could result in any air traffic <br />impacts. <br />d. Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature (e.g., sharp curves ~ ~ ~ ~' <br />or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? <br />(3,25) <br />Comment: The proposed ordinances will not result in any new <br />construction or physical improvements that could result in any traffic <br />hazard impacts. <br />e. Result in inadequate emergency access? ~ ~ ~ IrJ <br />Comment: The proposed ordinances will not result in any new <br />construction or physical improvements that could result in any impacts to <br />emergency access. <br />f. Result in inadequate parking capacity? <br />Comment: The proposed ordinances will not result in any new <br />construction or physical improvements that could result in any impacts to <br />parking capacity. <br />g. Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs supporting alternative <br />transportation (e.g., bus turnouts, bicycle racks)? <br />Comment: The proposed ordinances will not result in any new <br />construction or physical improvements and will not conflict with any <br />policies, plans, or programs supporting alternative transportation. <br />XVI. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the project: <br />a. Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the applicable Regional <br />Water Quality Control Board? <br />Comment: The proposed ordinances will not result in any new <br />construction or physical improvements that could result in any impacts to <br />utilities or service systems. <br />11 <br />